Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM U955, Créteil, France.
Health Policy. 2013 Oct;112(3):273-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 10.
Health technology assessment seeks to inform health policy- and decision-makers by promoting use of current best evidence and by addressing country specific factors, such as local context and values. In France, public health benefit (PHB) is one of the criteria used to inform decisions on the reimbursement of medicines. This article describes the methodological framework and the results after five years of assessment of PHB, by the French National Authority for Health. The semi-quantitative method used includes three dimensions that are: (1) the ability of a drug to improve the population's health status, (2) the drug's adequacy to cover public health needs, and; (3) the impact of the drug on the healthcare system. From 2005 to 2010, the PHB of 530 drugs was estimated, and 72% were assessed as having no PHB. The PHB was "low" for 88% of drugs expected to have a PHB, "medium" for 10%, and was considered to be "high" in only one case. The results of this experience show that it is feasible to assess the public health impact of drugs. But the high level of uncertainties at the time of a drug's first appraisal limits the assessment, which obviously has to be completed by reappraisal with post-marketing studies.
卫生技术评估旨在通过促进使用当前最佳证据并解决特定国家的因素(如当地情况和价值观),为卫生政策和决策者提供信息。在法国,公共卫生效益(PHB)是用于告知药品报销决策的标准之一。本文描述了法国国家卫生管理局在五年的 PHB 评估后,采用半定量方法得出的方法框架和结果。该方法包括三个维度:(1)药物改善人群健康状况的能力;(2)药物对公共卫生需求的适宜性;(3)药物对医疗保健系统的影响。从 2005 年到 2010 年,评估了 530 种药物的 PHB,其中 72%被评估为没有 PHB。预计具有 PHB 的药物中,88%的 PHB 被评估为“低”,10%为“中”,只有一种被认为是“高”。这一经验的结果表明,评估药物对公共卫生的影响是可行的。但在药物首次评估时存在高度不确定性,限制了评估,显然需要通过上市后研究进行重新评估来完成。