Suppr超能文献

从制造商的角度出发,利用欧盟卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)的概念框架来比较法国、意大利和德国卫生技术评估的决策驱动因素。

Leveraging EUnetHTA's conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer's point of view.

作者信息

Giuliani Giovanni, Chassagnol Frederic, Traub David, Gyldmark Marlene, Hebborn Ansgar, Ducournau Pierre, Ruof Jörg

机构信息

Roche S.p.A, Monza, Italy.

Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, France.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2018 Sep 21;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0201-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health Technology Assessments (HTA) procedures differ substantially across the various European countries. We reviewed recent appraisals of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in three major European markets (France; Italy; Germany) and identified and categorized related decision drivers.

METHODS

New marketing authorisation between January 2011 and August 2017, and Roche being the Marketing Authorization Holder, were included. Outcome of HTA appraisals by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), and Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) were reviewed. Respective decision drivers were identified and commonalities and differences across the three countries were determined leveraging the EUnetHTA conceptual taxonomy (i.e. the 9 domains of the EUnetHTA core model).

RESULTS

Within that time period Roche received European marketing authorization for eight new molecular entities (10 indications, respectively). Outcome of HTA appraisals was heterogeneous across the three countries. However, the four clinical domains of the EUnetHTA core model were driving the national HTA appraisals, with the clinical effectiveness domain being of most importance. Important drivers related to the other three clinical domains included the target patient population (subgroups, Germany), the current management of the condition (unmet need, Italy), the regulatory status (Orphan Designation, Germany), as well as safety considerations (all three countries). Average time between EMA approval and full commercial availability of new medicines was 63 (Germany), 459 (Italy), and 557 days (France).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical domains of the EUnetHTA framework are mainly driven by national HTA appraisals, providing a suitable starting point for further developing a joint European view on value and evidence. Underlying topics and issues still reveal considerable differences.

摘要

背景

各国的卫生技术评估(HTA)程序在欧洲各国之间存在很大差异。我们回顾了一家制药公司在欧洲三个主要市场(法国、意大利、德国)的近期评估情况,并确定了相关决策驱动因素并进行分类。

方法

纳入2011年1月至2017年8月期间的新上市许可,且罗氏为上市许可持有人。回顾了法国卫生高级管理局(HAS)、意大利药品管理局(AIFA)和联邦联合委员会(德国联合委员会,G-BA)的HTA评估结果。利用欧盟网络卫生技术评估概念分类法(即欧盟网络卫生技术评估核心模型的9个领域)确定了各自的决策驱动因素,并确定了三国之间的异同。

结果

在此期间,罗氏获得了8种新分子实体的欧洲上市许可(分别有10个适应症)。三国的HTA评估结果各不相同。然而,欧盟网络卫生技术评估核心模型的四个临床领域推动了国家HTA评估,其中临床有效性领域最为重要。与其他三个临床领域相关的重要驱动因素包括目标患者群体(亚组,德国)、疾病的当前管理(未满足的需求,意大利)、监管状态(孤儿药指定,德国)以及安全性考虑(所有三个国家)。欧洲药品管理局批准与新药完全上市之间的平均时间在德国为63天,在意大利为459天,在法国为557天。

结论

欧盟网络卫生技术评估框架的临床领域主要由国家HTA评估驱动,为进一步形成关于价值和证据的联合欧洲观点提供了合适的起点。潜在的主题和问题仍然存在很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68cd/6755607/11e88c7d2069/13561_2018_201_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验