First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):599-608. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70152-9. Epub 2013 May 9.
Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens have been widely used in China for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. However, their efficacy has not been tested in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in a large population. We assessed the efficacy and safety of homoharringtonine-based induction treatment for management of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia.
This open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study was done in 17 institutions in China between September, 2007, and July, 2011. Untreated patients aged 14-59 years with acute myeloid leukaemia were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated allocation schedule without stratification) to receive one of three induction regimens in a 1:1:1 ratio: homoharringtonine 2 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, and aclarubicin 20 mg/day on days 1-7 (HAA); homoharringtonine 2 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, and daunorubicin 40 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 (HAD); or daunorubicin 40-45 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7 (DA). Patients in complete remission were offered two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m(2) every 12 h on days 1-3). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission after two cycles of induction treatment and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, number ChiCTR-TRC-06000054.
We enrolled 620 patients, of whom 609 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 150 of 206 patients (73%) in the HAA group achieved complete remission versus 125 of 205 (61%) in the DA group (p=0.0108); 3-year event-free survival was 35.4% (95% CI 28.6-42.2) versus 23.1% (95% CI 17.4-29.3; p=0.0023). 133 of 198 patients (67%) in the HAD group had complete remission (vs DA, p=0·20) and 3-year event-free survival was 32.7% (95% CI 26.1-39.5; vs DA, p=0.08). Adverse events were much the same in all groups, except that more patients in the HAA (12 of 206 [5.8%]) and HAD (13 of 198 [6.6%]) groups died within 30 days than in the DA group (two of 205 [1%]; p=0.0067 vs HAA; p=0.0030 vs HAD).
A regimen of homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin is a treatment option for young, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
Chinese National High Tech Programme, Key Special Research Foundation of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, National Nature Science Foundation of China, National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project.
在中国,含高三尖杉酯碱的诱导方案已被广泛用于治疗急性髓系白血病患者。然而,其在大规模人群中的多中心随机对照试验中的疗效尚未得到检验。我们评估了高三尖杉酯碱为基础的诱导治疗方案在新诊断的急性髓系白血病患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项在中国 17 家机构进行的开放标签、随机、对照、3 期研究。2007 年 9 月至 2011 年 7 月,未经治疗的年龄在 14-59 岁的急性髓系白血病患者被随机分配(采用无分层的计算机生成分配方案)接受三种诱导方案之一,比例为 1:1:1:高三尖杉酯碱 2 mg/m²,每天 1-7 天(HAA);高三尖杉酯碱 2 mg/m²,每天 1-7 天,阿糖胞苷 100 mg/m²,每天 1-7 天,阿克拉霉素 20 mg/天(HAD);或柔红霉素 40-45 mg/m²,每天 1-3 天,阿糖胞苷 100 mg/m²,每天 1-7 天(DA)。完全缓解的患者接受两周期中剂量阿糖胞苷(12 h 每 12 h 1 g/m²,第 1-3 天)。主要终点是两周期诱导治疗后完全缓解的患者比例和意向治疗人群的无事件生存。该试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号 ChiCTR-TRC-06000054。
我们纳入了 620 名患者,其中 609 名患者被纳入意向治疗分析。HAA 组 206 名患者中有 150 名(73%)达到完全缓解,而 DA 组 205 名患者中有 125 名(61%)(p=0.0108);3 年无事件生存率为 35.4%(95%CI 28.6-42.2)vs 23.1%(95%CI 17.4-29.3;p=0.0023)。HAD 组 198 名患者中有 133 名(67%)达到完全缓解(与 DA 相比,p=0.20),3 年无事件生存率为 32.7%(95%CI 26.1-39.5;与 DA 相比,p=0.08)。除了 HAA 组(206 名患者中有 12 名[5.8%])和 HAD 组(198 名患者中有 13 名[6.6%])在 30 天内死亡的患者比 DA 组(205 名患者中有 2 名[1%])更多外,各组的不良事件基本相同(p=0.0067 与 HAA;p=0.0030 与 HAD)。
高三尖杉酯碱、阿糖胞苷和阿克拉霉素方案是治疗新诊断的急性髓系白血病年轻患者的一种治疗选择。
中国国家高技术研究发展计划、中国科学技术部关键特殊研究基金会、中国国家自然科学基金、国家临床重点专科建设项目。