Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Respir Med. 2013 Aug;107(8):1178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 May 9.
While administration of medical aerosols with heliox and positive airway pressure are both used clinically to improve aerosol delivery, few studies have differentiated their separate roles in treatment of asthmatics. The aim of this randomized, double blinded study is to differentiate the effect of heliox and oxygen with and without positive expiratory pressure (PEP), on delivery of radiotagged inhaled bronchodilators on pulmonary function and deposition in asthmatics. 32 patients between 18 and 65 years of age diagnosed with stable moderate to severe asthma were randomly assigned into four groups: (1) Heliox + PEP (n = 6), (2) Oxygen + PEP (n = 6), (3) Heliox (n = 11) and (4) Oxygen without PEP (n = 9). Each group received 1 mg of fenoterol and 2 mg of ipratropium bromide combined with 25 mCi (955 Mbq) of Technetium-99m and 0.9% saline to a total dose volume of 3 mL placed in a Venticis II nebulizer attached to a closed, valved mask with PEP of 0 or 10 cm H2O. Both gas type and PEP level were blinded to the investigators. Images were acquired with a single-head scintillation camera with the longitudinal and transverse division of the right lung as regions of interest (ROIs). While all groups responded to bronchodilators, only group 1 showed increase in FEV1%predicted and IC compared to the other groups (p < 0.04). When evaluating the ROI in the vertical gradient we observed higher deposition in the middle and lower third in groups 1 (p = 0.02) and 2 (p = 0.01) compared to group 3. In the horizontal gradient, a higher deposition in the central region in groups 1 (p = 0.03) and 2 (p = 0.02) compared to group 3 and intermediate region of group 2 compared to group 3. We conclude that aerosol deposition was higher in groups with PEP independent of gas used, while bronchodilator response with Heliox + PEP improved FEV1 % and IC compared to administration with Oxygen, Oxygen with PEP and Heliox alone. Trial registration NCT01268462.
虽然使用氦氧混合气和正压通气来管理医学气溶胶都被临床用于改善气溶胶输送,但很少有研究对它们在哮喘治疗中的单独作用进行区分。本随机、双盲研究的目的是区分氦氧混合气和氧气联合或不联合呼气末正压通气(PEP)对放射性标记吸入性支气管扩张剂在肺功能和沉积方面的影响。32 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、被诊断为稳定的中重度哮喘的患者被随机分为四组:(1)氦氧混合气+PEP(n = 6),(2)氧气+PEP(n = 6),(3)氦氧混合气(n = 11)和(4)无 PEP 的氧气(n = 9)。每组患者均接受 1 毫克芬特罗和 2 毫克异丙托溴铵,与 25mCi(955MBq)锝-99m 和 0.9%生理盐水混合,总剂量为 3 毫升,放置在 Venticis II 雾化器中,连接带有 0 或 10cmH2O PEP 的密闭、带阀面罩。气体类型和 PEP 水平均对研究人员保密。使用单探头闪烁相机对右肺的纵轴和横轴进行分区作为感兴趣区(ROI)。虽然所有组都对支气管扩张剂有反应,但只有第 1 组与其他组相比,FEV1%预计值和 IC 增加(p < 0.04)。在评估垂直梯度的 ROI 时,我们观察到第 1 组(p = 0.02)和第 2 组(p = 0.01)的中下部沉积较高,而第 3 组则较低。在水平梯度中,第 1 组(p = 0.03)和第 2 组(p = 0.02)的中央区域沉积较高,第 2 组的中间区域与第 3 组相比也较高。我们得出的结论是,无论使用何种气体,使用 PEP 的组的气溶胶沉积较高,而与使用氧气、氧气+PEP 和单独使用氦氧混合气相比,使用 Heliox+PEP 可改善 FEV1%和 IC。
试验注册 NCT01268462。