• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

林奇综合征先证者亲属对基因检测的接受度:系统评价。

Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044. Epub 2013 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044
PMID:23669308
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening of persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome can yield substantial benefits at acceptable costs, presuming sufficient uptake of genetic testing by first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the frequency of and factors associated with genetic testing of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo, PUBMED, and SCOPUS) for articles published through May 2011 reporting uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. Two investigators independently screened articles to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; data were collected on study population, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. A narrative, qualitative systematic review was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 1258 potentially relevant articles; 533 underwent full-text review, and 8 were included in the final analysis. Of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands, 52% or less received genetic testing. For each proband, 3.6 or fewer relatives underwent genetic testing. Demographic factors (age <50 years, female sex, parenthood, level of education, employment, participation in medical studies), psychological factors (lack of depressive symptoms), and possibly family history (greater number of relatives with cancer) were associated with uptake of genetic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing appears to be underutilized by first-degree relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome. The clinical benefit and economic feasibility of screening persons with colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome depend on optimizing family-wide uptake of genetic testing. Future research and clinical efforts should focus on ways to overcome barriers to genetic testing.

摘要

背景与目的

对新诊断结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征筛查,可以在可接受的成本下获得显著收益,假定林奇综合征先证者的一级亲属充分接受基因检测。我们进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定林奇综合征先证者一级亲属进行基因检测的频率和相关因素。

方法

我们在 4 个数据库(CINAHL、PsycInfo、PUBMED 和 SCOPUS)中搜索了截至 2011 年 5 月发表的报告林奇综合征先证者亲属接受基因检测情况的文章。两名调查员独立筛选文章以确定其是否符合纳入标准;收集了研究人群、遗传咨询和基因检测方面的数据。采用叙述性、定性系统综述方法。

结果

我们确定了 1258 篇潜在相关文章;对其中 533 篇进行了全文审查,最终有 8 篇文章被纳入分析。林奇综合征先证者一级亲属中,接受基因检测的比例不足 52%。每例先证者,仅有 3.6 名或更少的亲属接受了基因检测。人口统计学因素(<50 岁、女性、有子女、教育程度、就业、参加医学研究)、心理因素(无抑郁症状)和家族史(更多亲属患有癌症)与基因检测的接受情况相关。

结论

林奇综合征患者的一级亲属的基因检测似乎利用不足。对结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征筛查的临床获益和经济可行性取决于优化家族范围内基因检测的接受情况。未来的研究和临床工作应集中于克服基因检测障碍的方法。

相似文献

1
Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.林奇综合征先证者亲属对基因检测的接受度:系统评价。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044. Epub 2013 May 10.
2
Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(51):1-238. doi: 10.3310/hta21510.
3
Barriers and Facilitators in Diagnostic Pathways That Align Universal Tumor Screening and Mainstream Genetic Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review With a Narrative Synthesis.将通用肿瘤筛查与结直肠癌林奇综合征主流基因检测相结合的诊断途径中的障碍与促进因素:一项采用叙述性综合分析的范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 10;14:e70831. doi: 10.2196/70831.
4
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in the Lynch Syndrome Tumour Spectrum: A Comprehensive Overview from the European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists and the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors.林奇综合征肿瘤谱中的上尿路尿路上皮癌:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学术泌尿外科医生与全球罕见泌尿生殖系统肿瘤学会的全面综述
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Lynch Syndrome林奇综合征
6
Proband-mediated interventions to increase disclosure of genetic risk in families with a BRCA or Lynch syndrome condition: a systematic review.先证者介导的干预措施增加 BRCA 或 Lynch 综合征家族中遗传风险的披露:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Jan;31(1):18-34. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01200-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
7
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
8
Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.林奇综合征遗传易感性个体的护理建议:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1507-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1507.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician Recommendation for Hereditary Genetic Testing in Participants at Increased Risk for Hereditary Cancer.针对遗传性癌症风险增加的参与者进行遗传性基因检测的临床医生建议。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;17(12):1994. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121994.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: Universal Germline vs Sequential Screening.林奇综合征在结直肠癌筛查中的成本效益:全人群种系筛查与序贯筛查
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.03.006.
3
Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.
卫生系统主导的高危亲属早期同意及直接联系:试点研究结果
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):150-162. doi: 10.1159/000545404. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.医疗服务提供者介导的林奇综合征高危家庭成员级联检测:一项访谈研究
Fam Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2.
5
"I Didn't Have to Worry about It": Patient and Family Experiences with Health System Involvement in Notifying Relatives of Genetic Test Results.“我不必为此担心”:患者及其家属对健康系统参与通知亲属遗传检测结果的体验。
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):150-160. doi: 10.1159/000541532. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
6
Lynch syndrome in Mexican-Mestizo families: Genotype, phenotypes, and challenges in cascade testing among relatives at risk.墨西哥梅斯蒂索人家庭中的林奇综合征:基因型、表型以及对有风险亲属进行级联检测的挑战。
Heliyon. 2024 May 24;10(11):e31855. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31855. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
7
National Experiences from 30 Years of Provider-Mediated Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome Families-The Danish Model.林奇综合征家族30年提供者介导的级联检测的国家经验——丹麦模式
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 20;16(8):1577. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081577.
8
Parental Understanding of Their Child's Germline Genomic Testing: Intent of Disclosure to Their Child and Family.父母对其子女种系基因组检测的理解:向子女及家人披露检测结果的意图。
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1656. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121656.
9
Most people share genetic test results with relatives even if the findings are normal: Family communication in a diverse population.大多数人会与亲属分享基因检测结果,即便检测结果正常:来自多样化人群的家庭沟通。
Genet Med. 2023 Nov;25(11):100923. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100923. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
Privacy and utility of genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer syndromes living in three countries: the international cascade genetic screening experience.生活在三个国家的遗传性癌症综合征家族中基因检测的隐私与效用:国际级联基因筛查经验
Front Genet. 2023 May 9;14:1109431. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1109431. eCollection 2023.