• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务提供者介导的林奇综合征高危家庭成员级联检测:一项访谈研究

Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.

作者信息

Ong Serene, Chua Zi Yang, Yuen Jeanette, Chiang Jianbang, Zewen Zhang, Ngeow Joanne, Lysaght Tamra

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Fam Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2
PMID:40011264
Abstract

Cascade testing is often recommended for cancer predisposition syndromes, like Lynch syndrome (LS), to identify at-risk family members. The uptake of cascade testing is typically meditated by the proband's willingness to disclose their results with family members. Of which, cascade testing uptake rates in Singapore has been low, compared to global rates. Studies suggest that healthcare providers (HCPs)-meditated contact of at-risk family improves uptake, yet few have explored how receptive probands and family members are to such a model. Moreover, no studies to date have examined such a model of cascade testing in Asia. To address this gap, we interviewed 17 participants (probands and relatives) in Singapore to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of HCP-mediated cascade testing for families with LS. Our findings show broad acceptability for HCP-mediated disclosure to relatives, driven by a sense of beneficence. However, HCP involvement introduced three unique issues to disclosure process: (i) their clinical position, which conveys expertise and authority; (ii) relational complexities within family dynamics; and (iii) the notion of family-centric privacy. We propose that HCP-mediated disclosure may be best implemented through a cooperative and flexible process, tailored to each family's unique circumstances. This approach balances the efficiency of providing accurate genetic information whilst sensitively navigating familial relationships, thereby improving uptake while respecting cultural and relational nuances.

摘要

对于癌症易感综合征,如林奇综合征(LS),通常建议进行级联检测,以识别有风险的家庭成员。级联检测的接受程度通常取决于先证者向家庭成员披露其检测结果的意愿。其中,与全球比率相比,新加坡的级联检测接受率一直较低。研究表明,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)与有风险的家庭成员进行沟通可提高接受率,但很少有人探讨先证者和家庭成员对这种模式的接受程度。此外,迄今为止,尚无研究在亚洲考察这种级联检测模式。为了填补这一空白,我们采访了新加坡的17名参与者(先证者和亲属),以评估HCP介导的针对LS家庭的级联检测的可接受性和可行性。我们的研究结果表明,出于慈善意识,HCP介导向亲属披露信息具有广泛的可接受性。然而,HCP的参与给披露过程带来了三个独特的问题:(i)他们的临床地位,这传达了专业知识和权威;(ii)家庭动态中的关系复杂性;以及(iii)以家庭为中心的隐私观念。我们建议,HCP介导的披露可能最好通过一个合作且灵活的过程来实施,该过程应根据每个家庭的独特情况量身定制。这种方法在提供准确遗传信息的效率与敏感处理家庭关系之间取得平衡,从而在尊重文化和关系细微差别的同时提高接受率。

相似文献

1
Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.医疗服务提供者介导的林奇综合征高危家庭成员级联检测:一项访谈研究
Fam Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2.
2
Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.利益相关者对克服林奇综合征级联检测障碍的观点:一项定性研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Dec;13(12):1037-1046. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的症状前基因检测应用:文献系统综述及对临床实践的启示
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.
4
Communicating cancer risk within an African context: experiences, disclosure patterns and uptake rates following genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.在非洲背景下传递癌症风险:林奇综合征遗传检测后的经验、披露模式和接受率。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jul;92(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.不列颠哥伦比亚省和育空地区遗传性结直肠癌家族的基因检测:一项回顾性横断面分析。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;8(4):E637-E642. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190167. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
6
How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study.家庭如何就遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测进行沟通:一项定性研究的结果
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010.
7
A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic.基于家系的儿科癌症遗传诊所级联遗传检测方法。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00434-8.
8
Challenges and opportunities for Lynch syndrome cascade testing in the United States.美国林奇综合征级联检测面临的挑战与机遇
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00374-3. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:诊断策略及其影响。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May(150):1-180.
10
"I have always lived with the disease in the family": family adaptation to hereditary cancer-risk.“我一直生活在有家族病史的环境中”:家庭对遗传性癌症风险的适应。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01704-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Cascade testing for hereditary cancer in Singapore: how population genomics help guide clinical policy.新加坡遗传性癌症的级联检测:人群基因组学如何指导临床决策。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00376-1. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
2
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Genetic testing and family entanglements.
遗传检测与家庭纠葛
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114857. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114857. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
US private payers' perspectives on insurance coverage for genome sequencing versus exome sequencing: A study by the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium (CSER).美国私人支付者对基因组测序与外显子组测序保险覆盖范围的看法:临床测序证据生成研究联盟(CSER)的一项研究。
Genet Med. 2022 Jan;24(1):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.利益相关者对克服林奇综合征级联检测障碍的观点:一项定性研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Dec;13(12):1037-1046. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
Clinical outcomes of a genomic screening program for actionable genetic conditions.基因组筛查计划对可操作遗传条件的临床结果。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1874-1882. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0876-4. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Impact of free cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing on uptake in Singapore.免费癌症遗传易感性连锁基因检测对新加坡检测接受率的影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2019 Sep 13;4:22. doi: 10.1038/s41525-019-0096-5. eCollection 2019.
8
How Uncertainty Influences Lay People's Attitudes and Risk Perceptions Concerning Predictive Genetic Testing and Risk Communication.不确定性如何影响公众对预测性基因检测和风险沟通的态度及风险认知。
Front Genet. 2019 Apr 26;10:380. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00380. eCollection 2019.
9
Reasonable expectations of privacy in non-disclosure of familial genetic risk: What is it reasonable to expect?对不披露家族遗传风险的合理隐私期望:期望什么才合理?
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
The influence of Malay cultural beliefs on breast cancer screening and genetic testing: A focus group study.马来族文化信仰对乳腺癌筛查和基因检测的影响:一项焦点小组研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2855-2861. doi: 10.1002/pon.4902. Epub 2018 Oct 16.