Laboratory of Physiological and Molecular Imaging of the Abdomen IPMA, INSERM CRB3 - UMR773.
Invest Radiol. 2013 Oct;48(10):722-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182915912.
The objective of this study was to compare the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determined with 3 b values and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters in the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.
Seventy-six patients with 86 solid hepatic lesions, including 8 hemangiomas, 20 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, 9 adenomas, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, and 6 cholangiocarcinomas, were assessed in this prospective study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 11 b values to measure the ADCs (with b = 0, 150, and 500 s/mm) and the IVIM-derived parameters, namely, the pure diffusion coefficient and the perfusion-related diffusion fraction and coefficient. The diffusion parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors and between tumor types, and their diagnostic value in identifying tumor malignancy was assessed.
The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients were significantly higher in benign than in malignant tumors (benign: 2.32 [0.87] × 10 mm/s and 1.42 [0.37] × 10 mm/s vs malignant: 1.64 [0.51] × 10 mm/s and 1.14 [0.28] × 10 mm/s, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005), whereas the perfusion-related diffusion parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients provided similar accuracy in assessing tumor malignancy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.770 and 0.723, respectively). In the multigroup analysis, the ADC was found to be significantly higher in hemangiomas than in hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. In the same manner, it was higher in lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia than in metastases and cholangiocarcinomas. However, the pure diffusion coefficient was significantly higher only in hemangiomas versus hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas.
Compared with the ADC, the diffusion parameters derived from the IVIM model did not improve the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.
本研究旨在比较采用 3 个 b 值确定的表观扩散系数(ADC)和体素内不相干运动(IVIM)衍生参数在确定肝肿瘤良恶性和肿瘤类型特征方面的价值。
本前瞻性研究共纳入 76 例 86 个实性肝脏病变患者,包括 8 个血管瘤、20 个局灶性结节增生、9 个腺瘤、30 个肝细胞癌、13 个转移瘤和 6 个胆管细胞癌。采用 11 个 b 值采集扩散加权图像,测量 ADC(b 值分别为 0、150 和 500 s/mm)和 IVIM 衍生参数,即纯扩散系数和灌注相关扩散分数和系数。比较良恶性肿瘤以及不同肿瘤类型之间的扩散参数,并评估其在识别肿瘤良恶性方面的诊断价值。
良性肿瘤的表观和纯扩散系数明显高于恶性肿瘤(良性:2.32 [0.87]×10mm/s 和 1.42 [0.37]×10mm/s;恶性:1.64 [0.51]×10mm/s 和 1.14 [0.28]×10mm/s;P<0.0001 和 P=0.0005),而两组间灌注相关扩散参数无显著差异。表观和纯扩散系数在评估肿瘤良恶性方面具有相似的准确性(受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.770 和 0.723)。在多组分析中,血管瘤的 ADC 明显高于肝细胞癌、转移瘤和胆管细胞癌。同样,局灶性结节增生的 ADC 也高于转移瘤和胆管细胞癌。然而,只有纯扩散系数在血管瘤与肝细胞癌和胆管细胞癌之间有显著差异。
与 ADC 相比,IVIM 模型衍生的扩散参数并不能提高肝肿瘤良恶性的判断和肿瘤类型的特征。