College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;47(6):819-27. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R705. Epub 2013 May 14.
To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data available for aflibercept and compare the drug to other therapeutic options for treatment of macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) to determine its likely role in therapy.
A PubMed search using the terms aflibercept and VEGF trap-eye was conducted to identify initial literature sources. No timeframe was used for exclusion of older trials. All trials referenced were published between January 1995 and December 2012.
Trials pertaining to oncologic use were excluded, as were studies conducted in animals and those written in a language other than English. Abstracts of the remaining trials were evaluated for determination of relevance to this review. Additional information sources were obtained via Internet and PubMed following a review of references.
While previous Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials for other indications (age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema) have shown intravitreal injections of aflibercept to be safe and well tolerated in many patients, preliminary results from the ongoing COPERNICUS and GALILEO trials proved the efficacy of this medication in treating macular edema secondary to CRVO. Of the combined 358 patients studied in COPERNICUS and GALILEO, 56% and 60%, respectively, of the patients receiving aflibercept 2 mg monthly achieved at least a 15-letter improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline over 6 months compared with just 12% and 22% in the control group (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, in COPERNICUS and GALILEO, patients achieved a 21.3- and 14.7-letter improvement, respectively, in BCVA compared with placebo (p < 0.01 for both).
In September 2012, aflibercept became the second vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor approved for treatment of macular edema secondary to CRVO. While efficacy and safety appear similar to other anti-VEGF treatments, the higher potency, binding affinity, and duration of action make aflibercept an appealing new option.
回顾阿柏西普的药理学、疗效和安全性数据,并将其与治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)后黄斑水肿的其他治疗选择进行比较,以确定其在治疗中的可能作用。
使用阿柏西普和 VEGF 陷阱眼这两个术语在 PubMed 上进行了搜索,以确定初始文献来源。没有排除旧试验的时间范围。所有引用的试验均发表于 1995 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月之间。
排除了与肿瘤学用途相关的试验,以及在动物中进行的试验和用其他语言撰写的试验。评估了其余试验的摘要,以确定与本综述相关的内容。通过审查参考文献,从互联网和 PubMed 获得了其他信息来源。
虽然其他适应证(年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿)的先前的 1 期、2 期和 3 期试验已经证明,在许多患者中,玻璃体内注射阿柏西普是安全且耐受良好的,但正在进行的 COPERNICUS 和 GALILEO 试验的初步结果证明了该药治疗 CRVO 继发黄斑水肿的疗效。在 COPERNICUS 和 GALILEO 中接受每月 2mg 阿柏西普治疗的 358 例患者中,分别有 56%和 60%的患者在 6 个月时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)较基线至少提高了 15 个字母,而对照组分别只有 12%和 22%(均为 p<0.01)。此外,在 COPERNICUS 和 GALILEO 中,患者的 BCVA 分别提高了 21.3 个和 14.7 个字母,而安慰剂组分别提高了 14.7 个字母(均为 p<0.01)。
2012 年 9 月,阿柏西普成为第二种被批准用于治疗 CRVO 后黄斑水肿的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂。虽然疗效和安全性与其他抗 VEGF 治疗相似,但较高的效力、结合亲和力和作用持续时间使阿柏西普成为一种有吸引力的新选择。