Wilkinson R T
Medical Research Council, Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, U.K.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 May;42(2):401-23. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401228.
In choice serial reaction time (RT), Response-to-next-Stimulus Interval (RSI) was varied from 0 to 600 msec in 40-msec steps. In three experiments, RT fell and errors rose as RSI was increased to 480 msec; they remained unchanged thereafter. The effect of RSI on RT was not linear, was reduced by 6- as compared with 4- or 3-choice responding, and was unaffected by sleep deprivation, despite loss of sleep reducing RT overall. The effect of penultimate RSI on RT was similar to that current RSI, but smaller. Two explanations of RSI--response-generated kinaesthetic feedback blocking a "central processor" and a preparatory interval as in warned simple RT--are rejected. Instead, the idea of "relative refractory state" is revived but now, because of the RSI/error finding, biased more towards responding than stimulus reception and encoding. In all three experiments the influence of RSI on RT was reduced with practice. If practice encourages automatic rather than controlled processing (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977), the prediction is that the former will show less refractoriness.
