Suppr超能文献

评估早发性脊柱侧凸患者治疗选择的临床不确定性程度。

Evaluating the extent of clinical uncertainty among treatment options for patients with early-onset scoliosis.

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 701 North First Street, Room D220, Springfield, IL 62702, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):e67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00805.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Literature guiding the management of early-onset scoliosis consists primarily of studies with a low level of evidence. Evaluation of clinical equipoise (i.e., when there is no known superiority among treatment modalities) allows for prioritization of research efforts. The objective of this study was to evaluate areas of clinical uncertainty among pediatric spine surgeons regarding the treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

METHODS

Fourteen experienced pediatric spine surgeons participated in semistructured interviews to identify clinical variables that influence decision making in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. A series of case scenarios of 315 patients with idiopathic and neuromuscular early-onset scoliosis was then developed to be representative of those encountered in clinical practice. Using an online survey, eleven surgeons selected their choice of eight treatment options for each case scenario. Associations between case characteristics and treatment choices were assessed with chi-square and logistic regression analysis. Participants then reviewed the areas of treatment uncertainty identified in the survey, nominated additional research questions of interest, and ranked their interest to further explore the identified research questions.

RESULTS

Collective equipoise was identified in numerous scenarios in the survey spanning a range of ages and magnitudes of scoliosis, and additional questions were identified during the nominal group technique. Areas that had the greatest clinical uncertainty included the management of patients who have finished treatment with a growing-rod, timing of rod-lengthening intervals, and indications for spine-based and rib-based proximal instrumentation anchors. The use of rib anchors compared with spine-based anchors was ranked highly for consideration in future clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in decision making with regard to the optimum treatment of certain subsets of patients with early-onset scoliosis reflects gaps in the available evidence. Structured consensus methods identified priorities for higher levels of research in this area of scoliosis. Higher-level studies, including randomized trials, should focus on answering the questions highlighted in this report.

摘要

背景

指导早发性脊柱侧凸管理的文献主要由低证据水平的研究组成。对临床均衡性(即治疗方式之间没有已知优势)的评估可以优先考虑研究工作。本研究的目的是评估儿科脊柱外科医生在早发性脊柱侧凸治疗方面存在临床不确定性的领域。

方法

14 名经验丰富的儿科脊柱外科医生参与了半结构化访谈,以确定影响早发性脊柱侧凸治疗决策的临床变量。然后,针对特发性和神经肌肉性早发性脊柱侧凸患者,开发了 315 个病例场景的系列,这些病例场景代表了在临床实践中遇到的情况。11 名外科医生使用在线调查,根据每个病例场景选择了 8 种治疗选择。使用卡方和逻辑回归分析评估病例特征与治疗选择之间的关系。然后,参与者审查了调查中确定的治疗不确定性领域,提名了其他感兴趣的研究问题,并对进一步探讨确定的研究问题的兴趣进行了排名。

结果

在调查中的许多场景中都存在集体均衡,涵盖了一系列年龄和脊柱侧凸幅度,并且在名义群体技术中还确定了其他问题。具有最大临床不确定性的领域包括已完成生长棒治疗的患者的管理、棒延长间隔的时间以及脊柱和肋骨近端器械锚定的适应证。与脊柱锚定相比,肋骨锚定的使用在未来临床试验中被认为是高度考虑的因素。

结论

针对某些早发性脊柱侧凸患者的最佳治疗方案的决策存在差异,这反映了现有证据的不足。结构化共识方法确定了该领域更高水平研究的优先事项。包括随机试验在内的高级别研究应重点回答本报告中突出的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验