Suppr超能文献

老年患者桡骨远端骨折(AO A2、A3、C1型)掌侧固定角度钢板固定与克氏针固定的比较。

Comparison of palmar fixed-angle plate fixation with K-wire fixation of distal radius fractures (AO A2, A3, C1) in elderly patients.

作者信息

Goehre F, Otto W, Schwan S, Mendel T, Vergroesen P P, Lindemann-Sperfeld L

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, BG Kliniken Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Mar;39(3):249-57. doi: 10.1177/1753193413489057. Epub 2013 May 14.

Abstract

The objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to compare the results of two operative techniques used for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients classified as AO types A2, A3, and C1. Patients were treated with either fixed-angle volar plates or K-wires using a combined Kapandji and Willenegger technique. The functional results were determined after 3, 6, and 12 months. We included 40 patients aged over 65 years. Twenty-one patients were treated with plate fixation and 19 with K-wire fixation. The functional results, after 1 year, were nearly the same in both treatment groups, suggesting that either method is suitable for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures of AO types A2, A3, and C1 in elderly patients. Sixteen of 21 patients with plate fixation and 17 of 19 patients with K-wire fixation present good results as assessed by the Castaing score. The median DASH score was three in both groups after 1 year. The patients with plate fixation were able to resume activities of daily living 4 weeks earlier. The most common complication was an intermediate post-traumatic median nerve irritation. Both methods are suitable for the treatment of elderly patients with unstable distal radius fractures of AO types A2, A3, and C1. If early functional post-operative care is important, palmar fixed-angle plate fixation is an ideal treatment approach. Otherwise, K-wire fixation is an effective, minimally invasive method with comparable clinical results.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机对照试验的目的是比较两种手术技术用于治疗被归类为AO A2、A3和C1型的老年患者不稳定桡骨远端骨折的结果。患者采用联合卡潘迪(Kapandji)和维勒内格(Willenegger)技术,用角度固定掌侧板或克氏针进行治疗。在3个月、6个月和12个月后确定功能结果。我们纳入了40名65岁以上的患者。21名患者采用钢板固定治疗,19名患者采用克氏针固定治疗。1年后,两个治疗组的功能结果几乎相同,这表明两种方法都适用于治疗老年患者AO A2、A3和C1型不稳定桡骨远端骨折。根据卡斯坦(Castaing)评分评估,21名采用钢板固定的患者中有16名、19名采用克氏针固定的患者中有17名取得了良好结果。1年后两组的DASH评分中位数均为3。采用钢板固定的患者能够提前4周恢复日常生活活动。最常见的并发症是创伤后正中神经中度刺激。两种方法都适用于治疗AO A2、A3和C1型不稳定桡骨远端骨折的老年患者。如果术后早期功能护理很重要,掌侧角度固定钢板固定是一种理想的治疗方法。否则,克氏针固定是一种有效、微创的方法,临床结果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验