Suppr超能文献

老年关节周围桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗:系统评价。

Surgical Treatment of Periarticular Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopedics and Traumatology, A.O.U. Policlinico Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 11;60(10):1671. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101671.

Abstract

: The treatment of periarticular distal radius fractures remains challenging. Different surgical treatment options have been proposed as alternatives to conservative treatment. This systematic review aims to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, and complications among volar locking plates (VLPs), Kirschner-wire fixations, and external fixations (EFs) for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and older. : We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases assessing the effects of VLP, EF, and K-wire treatments for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) degrees after three surgical procedures, trying to assess the best treatment option. The secondary outcome included evaluation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, quick-DASH score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, grip strength, radiographic assessment, and complications comparing VLPs, EFs and K-wires. : A total of 23 studies were included, comparing VLP, EF, and K-wire fixation. The overall population comprised 5618 patients, with 4690 females and 1015 males, of which 4468 patients were treated with VLP, 503 with EF, and 647 with K-wire. The most common complications among the VLP group were complex regional pain syndrome (7.5%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6.8%); for the EF group, infections (9.8%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6.8%); and for the K-wire group, carpal tunnel syndrome (7.5%) and infections (6.9%). : VLP showed better clinical outcomes in the first few months after treatment. However, these differences decreased over time and became similar after one year. EF and K-wire fixations remain easier to manage during surgery.

摘要

: 桡骨远端关节周围骨折的治疗仍然具有挑战性。已经提出了不同的手术治疗选择,作为保守治疗的替代方法。本系统评价旨在比较掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)、克氏针固定和外固定(EF)治疗 60 岁及以上桡骨远端骨折患者的功能结果、影像学结果和并发症。 : 我们对 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Science Direct 数据库进行了全面检索,评估了 VLP、EF 和 K 线治疗 60 岁及以上桡骨远端骨折患者的效果。主要结局是评估三种手术方法后关节活动度(ROM)的程度,试图评估最佳治疗选择。次要结局包括评估上肢功能障碍、肩手(DASH)评分、快速 DASH 评分、患者腕关节评估(PRWE)评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、握力、影像学评估和比较 VLP、EF 和 K 线的并发症。 : 共纳入 23 项比较 VLP、EF 和 K 线固定的研究。总体人群包括 5618 例患者,其中女性 4690 例,男性 1015 例,其中 4468 例患者接受 VLP 治疗,503 例患者接受 EF 治疗,647 例患者接受 K 线治疗。VLP 组最常见的并发症是复杂性区域疼痛综合征(7.5%)和腕管综合征(6.8%);EF 组为感染(9.8%)和腕管综合征(6.8%);K 线组为腕管综合征(7.5%)和感染(6.9%)。 : VLP 在治疗后最初几个月的临床结果更好。然而,这些差异随着时间的推移而减少,在一年后变得相似。EF 和 K 线固定在手术过程中仍然更容易处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416d/11509121/1e0e31bbf824/medicina-60-01671-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验