• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长健康素养与儿科急诊就诊率的关系:系统评价。

The relationship between parent health literacy and pediatric emergency department utilization: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics Section of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2013.03.001
PMID:23680294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3808118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy in parents can potentially impact understanding of a child's diagnosis and treatment course. No reviews have addressed parent health literacy in the emergency department (ED), the relationship between parent health literacy and child ED utilization, or the impact of low literacy interventions on child ED utilization.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the peer-reviewed literature pertaining to parental health literacy and ED utilization. The following key questions were addressed: question (Q) 1) What is the prevalence of low health literacy, as estimated by validated health literacy measures, of parents in the ED? Q2) Is parent low health literacy related to ED use for children? Q3) Do low literacy interventions targeting parents likely to have low health literacy affect ED use for children?

DATA SOURCES

The authors reviewed 483 unduplicated titles and abstracts published between 1980 and May 2012 using PubMed and CINAHL, with 117 retained for full review and 17 included in the final analytic review.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: All included articles had a valid measure of parent health literacy and a Q1) descriptive measurement of the population, Q2) ED utilization, or Q3) utilized a low literacy educational intervention.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

One author extracted data verified by a second author. Studies were rated for quality by both authors.

RESULTS

Q1) A median of 30% (interquartile range 22-36%) of parents in the ED possesses low health literacy. Q2) Studies investigating the relationship between health literacy and ED yielded mixed results. Q3) Seven of 8 low literacy interventions were associated with a reduction in ED use. Random effects pooled odds ratios from 6 studies showed intervention effectiveness (odds ratio 0.35; 95% CI 0.15-0.81).

LIMITATIONS

No intervention studies measured health literacy, limiting the ability to determine whether the low literacy intervention targeted health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Roughly 1 in 3 parents of children presenting to the ED have low health literacy. Importantly, interventions targeting parents likely to have low health literacy have an impact in reducing ED utilization.

摘要

背景

父母的健康素养较低可能会影响他们对孩子诊断和治疗过程的理解。目前尚无文献综述探讨急诊科(ED)中父母的健康素养、父母健康素养与儿童 ED 使用之间的关系,以及针对低文化素养父母的干预措施对儿童 ED 使用的影响。

目的

系统评价有关父母健康素养与 ED 使用的同行评议文献。本研究提出了以下三个关键问题:问题 1)使用经过验证的健康素养测量工具,ED 中父母的健康素养低的流行率是多少?问题 2)父母的低健康素养与儿童 ED 使用相关吗?问题 3)针对可能健康素养较低的父母的低文化素养干预措施是否会影响儿童 ED 使用?

数据来源

作者检索了 1980 年至 2012 年 5 月期间发表的 483 篇不重复的标题和摘要,使用了 PubMed 和 CINAHL,其中 117 篇全文符合纳入标准并进行了回顾性分析,17 篇最终纳入分析性综述。

研究入选标准、参与者和干预措施:所有纳入的文章都有有效的父母健康素养测量工具,且都回答了问题 1)人群的描述性测量,问题 2)ED 使用,或问题 3)使用了低文化素养教育干预措施。

研究评估和综合方法

一位作者提取数据,由另一位作者验证。两位作者均对研究进行质量评估。

结果

问题 1)ED 中约 30%(四分位距 22-36%)的父母健康素养较低。问题 2)研究健康素养与 ED 之间的关系得出了不同的结果。问题 3)8 项低文化素养干预措施中有 7 项与 ED 使用减少相关。来自 6 项研究的随机效应汇总优势比表明干预的有效性(比值比 0.35;95%CI 0.15-0.81)。

局限性

没有干预研究测量健康素养,限制了确定低文化素养干预措施是否针对健康素养的能力。

结论和对关键发现的影响

大约每 3 个 ED 就诊儿童的父母中就有 1 个健康素养较低。重要的是,针对可能健康素养较低的父母的干预措施可减少 ED 使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/1c6a1a2e2418/nihms-518922-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/24b743fa51bd/nihms-518922-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/6e7f7915a27f/nihms-518922-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/1c6a1a2e2418/nihms-518922-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/24b743fa51bd/nihms-518922-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/6e7f7915a27f/nihms-518922-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74e/3808118/1c6a1a2e2418/nihms-518922-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The relationship between parent health literacy and pediatric emergency department utilization: a systematic review.家长健康素养与儿科急诊就诊率的关系:系统评价。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
2
Evaluating structure and content of parent-implemented early logopaedic intervention models following the three stages of communicative development in children with cleft lip and/or palate: Systematic literature review with narrative synthesis.评估唇腭裂儿童沟通发展三阶段中父母实施早期言语治疗干预模式的结构和内容:系统文献回顾与叙述性综合。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1923-1945. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13038. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
4
Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment.针对经历复杂创伤后应激障碍和/或儿童期受虐待经历的父母,从怀孕到出生后两年的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD014874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014874.pub2.
5
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
6
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
8
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.对0至6岁唐氏综合征儿童言语、语言和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
The effectiveness of interventions to treat severe acute malnutrition in young children: a systematic review.干预措施治疗幼儿严重急性营养不良的效果:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(19):1-316. doi: 10.3310/hta16190.
10
Intramuscular versus oral corticosteroids to reduce relapses following discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma.肌肉注射与口服皮质类固醇用于减少急性哮喘患者从急诊科出院后的复发情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD012629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012629.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits and Pediatric Eye Provider Location and Density.儿科与眼睛相关的急诊科就诊情况以及儿科眼科医疗服务提供者的地点和密度。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Mar 28;5(5):100776. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100776. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
2
Health Care and Health Information Access by Parents With Young Children in Regional Queensland.昆士兰地区有幼儿的父母的医疗保健与健康信息获取情况
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70060.
3
Association between the use of an app for providing healthcare information for parents and urgent emergency department visits for children: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of prescription filling after visits to the pediatric emergency department.小儿急诊科就诊后处方配药的预测因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):22-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31823ed6e4.
2
Parental health literacy and asthma education delivery during a visit to a community-based pediatric emergency department: a pilot study.在社区儿科急诊科就诊期间家长的健康素养与哮喘教育提供情况:一项试点研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jun;27(6):469-74. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31821c98a8.
3
A reduction in emergency department use by children from a parent educational intervention.
一款为家长提供医疗保健信息的应用程序的使用与儿童紧急急诊就诊之间的关联:日本的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 7;15(4):e098838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098838.
4
Caregiver alignment with triage acuity levels and drivers for discrepancy between caregiver assessment and triage acuity levels: a cross-sectional questionnaire based study.护理人员与分诊 acuity 水平的一致性以及护理人员评估与分诊 acuity 水平之间差异的驱动因素:一项基于横断面问卷调查的研究。 (注:这里“acuity”可能结合医学语境准确意思是“ acuity level 指的是病情严重程度分级等类似意思,比如急重症分级等,具体准确意思需结合完整医学文献背景确定 )
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12163-w.
5
A national cross-sectional survey of health literacy of caregivers attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments.一项针对前往加拿大儿科急诊科的护理人员健康素养的全国性横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0314826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314826. eCollection 2024.
6
Low caregiver health literacy is associated with non-urgent pediatric emergency department use.照顾者健康素养低与非紧急情况下儿童急诊科就诊有关。
CJEM. 2025 Jan;27(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00771-8. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
7
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
8
Improving Parental Health Literacy in Primary Caregivers of 0- to 3-Year-Old Children Through a WeChat Official Account: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.通过微信公众号提高 0-3 岁儿童主要照顾者的家长健康素养:整群随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 4;10:e54623. doi: 10.2196/54623.
9
Evaluation of Parents' Use of a Child Health Care Information App and Their Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Study.父母对儿童保健信息应用程序的使用及其健康素养评估:横断面研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Apr 11;7:e48478. doi: 10.2196/48478.
10
Experience of an Italian Pediatric Third Level Emergency Department during the 2022-2023 Bronchiolitis Epidemic: A Focus on Discharged Patients and Revisits.意大利一家儿科三级急诊科在2022 - 2023年毛细支气管炎流行期间的经验:聚焦出院患者及复诊情况
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;11(3):268. doi: 10.3390/children11030268.
一项针对家长的教育干预措施使儿童急诊就诊次数减少。
Fam Med. 2011 Feb;43(2):106-11.
4
Empowering low-income parents with skills to reduce excess pediatric emergency room and clinic visits through a tailored low literacy training intervention.通过一项针对低识字率的培训干预措施,增强低收入家长的技能,以减少儿童急诊室和诊所的过度就诊。
J Health Commun. 2010 Dec;15(8):895-910. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522228.
5
Health literacy and emergency department outcomes: a systematic review.健康素养与急诊结局:系统评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;57(4):334-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.035. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
6
Impact of a household environmental intervention delivered by lay health workers on asthma symptom control in urban, disadvantaged children with asthma.由非专业卫生工作者实施的家庭环境干预对城市贫困哮喘儿童哮喘症状控制的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S657-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165423.
7
The health literacy of parents in the United States: a nationally representative study.美国父母的健康素养:一项具有全国代表性的研究。
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S289-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162E.
8
Health literacy and child health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.健康素养与儿童健康结局:文献系统综述
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S265-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162B.
9
Impact of a health literacy intervention on pediatric emergency department use.健康素养干预对儿科急诊科就诊的影响。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Jul;25(7):434-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ab78c7.
10
Health Literacy among Parents of Pediatric Patients.家长的健康素养与儿科患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;9(3):130-4.