Suppr超能文献

直接金属激光烧结系统制作的三单位固定义齿边缘适合性的评价。

An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system.

机构信息

Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2013 Jul;29(7):e91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using a newly developed direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) system with that of three-unit FDPs by a conventional lost wax technique (LW) method.

METHODS

Ten cobalt-chromium alloy three-unit FDPs using DMLS system and another ten nickel-chromium alloy FDPs using LW method were fabricated. Marginal fit was examined using a light-body silicone. After setting, the silicon film was cut into four parts and the thickness of silicon layer was measured at 160× magnification using a digital microscope to measure absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG) and internal gap (IG). A repeated measure ANOVA for statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package version 12.0 (α=0.05).

RESULTS

The mean values of AMD, MG, and IG were significantly larger in the DMLS group than in the LW group (p<0.001). Means of AMD, MG and IG in the first molars were 83.3, 80.0, and 82.0μm in the LW group; and 128.0, 112.0, and 159.5μm in the DMLS group, respectively. No significant difference between measurements for premolars and molars was found (p>0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

The marginal fit of the DMLS system appeared significantly inferior compared to that of the conventional LW method and slightly larger than the acceptable range. For clinical application further improvement of DMLS system may be required.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在评估和比较使用新开发的直接金属激光烧结(DMLS)系统制作的三个单位固定义齿(FDP)与传统失蜡技术(LW)方法制作的三个单位 FDP 的边缘适合性。

方法

使用 DMLS 系统制作十个钴铬合金三单位 FDP,使用 LW 方法制作十个镍铬合金 FDP。使用轻体硅橡胶检查边缘适合性。凝固后,将硅膜切成四部分,并用数字显微镜在 160×放大倍数下测量硅层的厚度,以测量绝对边缘差异(AMD)、边缘间隙(MG)和内部间隙(IG)。使用 SPSS 统计软件包版本 12.0 进行重复测量方差分析(α=0.05)。

结果

DMLS 组的 AMD、MG 和 IG 的平均值明显大于 LW 组(p<0.001)。LW 组第一磨牙的 AMD、MG 和 IG 的平均值分别为 83.3、80.0 和 82.0μm;DMLS 组分别为 128.0、112.0 和 159.5μm。在前磨牙和磨牙的测量值之间未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。

意义

与传统的 LW 方法相比,DMLS 系统的边缘适合性明显较差,略大于可接受范围。对于临床应用,可能需要进一步改进 DMLS 系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验