Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University Medical Center, 1200 Main St. West, Room 4E17, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jun;22(6):1216-24. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2531-y. Epub 2013 May 17.
Several case series have been published exploring a variety of surgical treatments for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in patients 18 years and younger, but a systematic review is currently lacking. This systemic review identifies the various surgical techniques reported in the literature for treating OCD and assesses the effectiveness of these treatments based on functional outcomes and radiographic healing.
A search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify clinical studies reporting outcomes of surgical management of OCD in the knee. A quality assessment of the included articles was conducted independently by 2 reviewers using a quality assessment tool developed by Yang et al.
A total of 25 papers including 470 patients aged ≤18 years (516 lesions) met the eligibility criteria and were reviewed. Surgical techniques for stable lesions included (arthroscopic and open) transarticular drilling, either alone (41%) or with bioabsorbable pin fixation (3%), extra-articular drilling (29%) and fixation with bioabsorbable screws (4%) or bone pegs (4%). For unstable lesions, surgical techniques included (arthroscopic and open) fixation with bioabsorbable pins (9%), metal screws (4%), bone pegs (4 %), osteochondral plugs (3%) or bioabsorbable screws (2%), as well as transarticular drilling with bioabsorbable pin fixation (3%) and drilling with metal screw fixation (2%).
The most common techniques were transarticular drilling for stable lesions and bioabsorbable pin fixation for unstable lesions. The key findings were that the vast majority of lesions healed postoperatively, regardless of technique, and that high-quality trials are required to more appropriately compare the effectiveness of techniques.
Systematic review, Level IV.
已有数项病例系列研究探讨了 18 岁及以下患者的剥脱性骨软骨炎(OCD)的各种手术治疗方法,但目前缺乏系统评价。本系统评价旨在确定文献中报道的各种治疗 OCD 的手术技术,并根据功能结果和影像学愈合来评估这些治疗方法的有效性。
对 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 数据库进行检索,以确定报道膝关节 OCD 手术治疗结果的临床研究。两名评审员使用 Yang 等人开发的质量评估工具对纳入的文章进行独立质量评估。
共有 25 篇论文,包括 470 名≤18 岁(516 处病变)的患者符合纳入标准并进行了综述。稳定病变的手术技术包括(关节镜和开放)经关节钻孔术,单独应用(41%)或联合可吸收钉固定(3%)、关节外钻孔术(29%)和可吸收螺钉固定(4%)或骨栓固定(4%)。对于不稳定病变,手术技术包括(关节镜和开放)可吸收钉固定(9%)、金属螺钉固定(4%)、骨栓固定(4%)、骨软骨栓固定(3%)或可吸收螺钉固定(2%),以及经关节钻孔联合可吸收钉固定(3%)和金属螺钉固定(2%)。
最常见的技术是稳定病变的经关节钻孔术和不稳定病变的可吸收钉固定术。主要发现是,无论采用何种技术,绝大多数病变术后均愈合,需要高质量的试验来更恰当地比较技术的有效性。
系统评价,IV 级。