Division of Sports Medicine, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Dec;51(6):497-505. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2082262. Epub 2022 May 31.
Osteochondritis dissecans can result in significant limitations in activity, pain, and early osteoarthritis. There are various treatment modalities to address these defects. The purpose of this study was to provide a qualitative summary of the various treatment options for unstable osteochondritis dissecans in the knee.
A literature search was performed on osteochondritis dissecans in the knee using PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases. The search was completed using a combination of the following terms: 'osteochondritis dissecans,' 'OCD,' 'osteochondral,' 'articular cartilage,' 'repair,' 'surgery,' 'treatment,' 'osteochondral allograft,' 'autologous chondrocyte implantation,' 'unstable,' 'knee,' 'clinical studies.'
A total of 682 studies were found, of which 24 were included in the qualitative analysis. The quality score ranged from 46 to 80, and the mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 17 years. The most common surgical procedures were internal fixation (n = 7 studies), ACI (n = 6), fragment excision (n = 3), MACI (n = 2), bone graft + ACI (n = 2), OCA (n = 2), mosaicplasty/OAT (n = 2), and scaffold (n = 2). Overall, the reported outcome measures were heterogeneous in nature. Post-operative International Knee Documentations Committee (IKDC) scores ranged from 75 to 85 and Lysholm scores ranged from 70 to 93.5. Tegner scores ranged from 4 to 5. Rates of failure, complication, and revision were highly variable across studies and surgical techniques.
There are a variety of surgical options for the treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans. In skeletally immature patients, internal fixation demonstrated acceptable rates of radiographic union and patient reported outcome measures. In skeletally mature patients with large lesions, MACI and OCA transplantation provided similar patient reported outcomes.
剥脱性骨软骨炎可导致活动受限、疼痛和早期骨关节炎。有多种治疗方法可以解决这些缺陷。本研究的目的是对膝关节不稳定剥脱性骨软骨炎的各种治疗选择进行定性总结。
使用 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase 和 Cochrane 电子数据库对膝关节剥脱性骨软骨炎进行文献检索。使用以下术语的组合完成搜索:“剥脱性骨软骨炎”、“OCD”、“骨软骨”、“关节软骨”、“修复”、“手术”、“治疗”、“骨软骨同种异体移植物”、“自体软骨细胞植入”、“不稳定”、“膝关节”、“临床研究”。
共发现 682 项研究,其中 24 项纳入定性分析。质量评分范围为 46 至 80,平均随访时间为 2 至 17 年。最常见的手术程序是内固定(n=7 项研究)、ACI(n=6)、骨块切除(n=3)、MACI(n=2)、骨移植+ACI(n=2)、OCA(n=2)、马赛克plasty/OAT(n=2)和支架(n=2)。总体而言,报告的术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分范围为 75 至 85,Lysholm 评分范围为 70 至 93.5。Tegner 评分范围为 4 至 5。失败率、并发症和翻修率在不同研究和手术技术之间差异很大。
对于不稳定的剥脱性骨软骨炎,有多种手术选择。在骨骼未成熟的患者中,内固定显示出可接受的影像学愈合率和患者报告的结果测量值。在骨骼成熟且有大病灶的患者中,MACI 和 OCA 移植提供了相似的患者报告结果。