• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生对 NIAAA 饮酒指南遵守情况的性别差异。

Sex differences in college student adherence to NIAAA drinking guidelines.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Center for Addiction Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;37(10):1779-86. doi: 10.1111/acer.12159. Epub 2013 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/acer.12159
PMID:23682991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3987863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exceeding nationally recommended drinking limits puts individuals at increased risk of experiencing harmful effects due to alcohol consumption. Both weekly and daily limits exist to prevent harm due to toxicity and intoxication, respectively. It remains unclear how well college students adhere to recommended limits, and whether their drinking is sensitive to the wider sex difference in weekly versus daily drinking limits.

METHODS

This study used a daily-level, academic-year-long, multisite sample to describe adherence to NIAAA daily (no more than 4 drinks per day for men, 3 drinks per day for women) and weekly (no more than 14 drinks per week for men, 7 drinks per week for women) drinking guidelines, and to test for sex differences and time effects. College students (n = 992; 58% female) reported daily drinking on a biweekly basis using web-based surveys throughout their first year of college.

RESULTS

Women exceeded weekly limits more frequently (15% of weeks [14 to 17%]) than men (12% [10 to 14%]). Women and men exceeded daily drinking limits similarly often (25 and 27%, respectively). In a generalized estimating equations analysis across all 18 biweekly assessments, adjusted for covariates and a linear trend over time, women were more likely to exceed weekly guidelines compared to men. Sex differences in exceeding daily limits were not significant. Over time, rates of exceeding limits declined for daily limits but only for men for weekly limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Female college students are more likely to exceed weekly alcohol intake limits than men. Furthermore, trends over time suggest that college students may be maturing out of heavy episodic drinking, but women may not mature out of harmful levels of weekly drinking. The observed disparity in risk for long-term health consequences may represent a missed opportunity for education and intervention.

摘要

背景

超出国家推荐的饮酒限制会使个人因饮酒而遭受有害影响的风险增加。每周和每日限制的存在分别是为了防止因毒性和醉酒而造成伤害。目前尚不清楚大学生对推荐限制的遵守情况如何,以及他们的饮酒行为是否对每周和每日饮酒限制之间的广泛性别差异敏感。

方法

本研究使用了一种基于日常的、跨学年的多地点样本,描述了对 NIAAA 每日(男性每天不超过 4 杯,女性每天不超过 3 杯)和每周(男性每周不超过 14 杯,女性每周不超过 7 杯)饮酒指南的遵守情况,并测试了性别差异和时间效应。大学生(n=992;58%为女性)在大学第一年的每两周通过网络调查报告每日饮酒情况。

结果

女性比男性更频繁地超过每周限制(15%的周数[14%至 17%])。女性和男性的每日饮酒限制超标频率相似(分别为 25%和 27%)。在对所有 18 次双周评估进行的广义估计方程分析中,调整了协变量和随时间的线性趋势,女性比男性更有可能超过每周指导方针。在超过每日限制方面,性别差异不显著。随着时间的推移,每日限制的超标率下降,但仅对男性而言,每周限制的超标率下降。

结论

与男性相比,女大学生更有可能超过每周的饮酒摄入量限制。此外,随着时间的推移,趋势表明,大学生可能已经不再有重度饮酒的习惯,但女性可能没有摆脱每周饮酒的有害水平。观察到的长期健康后果风险差异可能代表了教育和干预的错失机会。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in college student adherence to NIAAA drinking guidelines.大学生对 NIAAA 饮酒指南遵守情况的性别差异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;37(10):1779-86. doi: 10.1111/acer.12159. Epub 2013 May 17.
2
Implementation of NIAAA College Drinking Task Force recommendations: how are colleges doing 6 years later?实施 NIAAA 学院饮酒问题特别工作组建议的情况:6 年后,各高校表现如何?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct;34(10):1687-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01268.x. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
3
Quantifying the risks associated with exceeding recommended drinking limits.量化与超过建议饮酒限量相关的风险。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 May;29(5):902-8. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000164544.45746.a7.
4
Toward the attainment of low-risk drinking goals: a 10-year progress report.迈向低风险饮酒目标:一份十年进展报告。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004 Sep;28(9):1371-8. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000139811.24455.3e.
5
Commentary on Nelson, Toomey, Lenk, et al. (2010): "Implementation of NIAAA College Drinking Task Force recommendations: how are colleges doing 6 years later?".对纳尔逊、图米、伦克等人(2010年)的评论:“美国国家酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所高校饮酒问题特别工作组建议的实施情况:6年后高校做得如何?”
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct;34(10):1694-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01315.x.
6
US low-risk drinking guidelines: an examination of four alternatives.美国低风险饮酒指南:四种替代方案的审视。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Dec;24(12):1820-9.
7
Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers.美国大学生及其未上大学的同龄人中的酒精使用障碍
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;62(3):321-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.321.
8
An empirical approach to evaluating the validity of alternative low-risk drinking guidelines.评估替代低风险饮酒指南有效性的实证方法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Mar;31(2):141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00335.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
9
Daily college student drinking patterns across the first year of college.大学生在大学第一年的日常饮酒模式。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):613-24. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.613.
10
Profiles of College Drinkers Defined by Alcohol Behaviors at the Week Level: Replication Across Semesters and Prospective Associations With Hazardous Drinking and Dependence-Related Symptoms.按周水平饮酒行为定义的大学生饮酒者概况:跨学期复制以及与危险饮酒和依赖相关症状的前瞻性关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan;77(1):38-50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.38.

引用本文的文献

1
Don't drink and drive, it's a prime: Cognitive effects of priming alcohol-congruent and incongruent goals among heavy versus light drinkers.切勿酒后驾车,这是首要原则:在重度和轻度饮酒者中,启动与酒精一致和不一致目标的认知效应。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(14):2966-2972. doi: 10.1177/1359105320934166. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
Effects of ethanol and varenicline on female Sprague-Dawley rats in a third trimester model of fetal alcohol syndrome.乙醇和伐伦克林对胎儿酒精综合征三期末模型雌性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠的影响。
Alcohol. 2018 Sep;71:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Harmful alcohol use and alcohol-related sex expectancies as predictors of risky sex among african american female college drinkers.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing alcohol use and problems in mandated college students: a randomized clinical trial using stepped care.针对大学生中饮酒问题和相关问题的干预:一项使用阶梯式治疗的随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Dec;80(6):1062-74. doi: 10.1037/a0029902. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Daily college student drinking patterns across the first year of college.大学生在大学第一年的日常饮酒模式。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):613-24. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.613.
3
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011.
有害饮酒及与酒精相关的性期望作为非裔美国女大学生饮酒者危险性行为的预测因素
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2018 Oct-Dec;17(4):389-400. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1255580. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
4
Risk factors and outcomes of chronic sexual harassment during the transition to college: Examination of a two-part growth mixture model.大学过渡期间慢性性骚扰的风险因素与结果:两部分增长混合模型的检验
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Nov;60:297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
College Student Dating Partner Drinking Profiles: Differences in Relationship Functioning and Relationship-Specific Alcohol Expectancies.大学生约会对象饮酒概况:关系功能及特定关系酒精期望的差异
Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Jun 6;51(7):840-52. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2016.1155613. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
6
Hazardous alcohol consumption among university students in Ireland: a cross-sectional study.爱尔兰大学生危险饮酒行为:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 29;5(1):e006045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006045.
美国农业部和美国卫生与公众服务部,《2010年美国人膳食指南》。第7版,华盛顿特区:美国政府印刷局,2011年1月。
Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
4
Moderate alcohol consumption during adult life, drinking patterns, and breast cancer risk.成年期适度饮酒、饮酒模式与乳腺癌风险。
JAMA. 2011 Nov 2;306(17):1884-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1590.
5
Adverse consequences of student drinking: the role of sex, social anxiety, drinking motives.学生饮酒的不良后果:性别、社交焦虑、饮酒动机的作用。
Addict Behav. 2011 Aug;36(8):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
6
Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: a two-year randomized controlled trial.基于网络的个性化规范反馈的疗效:一项为期两年的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):898-911. doi: 10.1037/a0020766.
7
How good is fine-grained Timeline Follow-back data? Comparing 30-day TLFB and repeated 7-day TLFB alcohol consumption reports on the person and daily level.精细化时间线访谈回溯数据的效果如何?在个体和每日水平上比较 30 天 TLFB 和重复的 7 天 TLFB 酒精摄入量报告。
Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;35(12):1138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
8
Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.对大学生进行简短的动机和家长干预:一项随机析因研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):349-61. doi: 10.1037/a0019166.
9
Web-based alcohol prevention for incoming college students: a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的大学新生酒精预防项目:一项随机对照试验
Addict Behav. 2010 Mar;35(3):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
10
Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005.1998 - 2005年美国18 - 24岁大学生中与酒精相关的死亡率和发病率的规模及趋势。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):12-20. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12.