Suppr超能文献

绷带或双弹力袜用于静脉水肿的初始治疗?一项随机对照的初步研究。

Bandages or double stockings for the initial therapy of venous oedema? A randomized, controlled pilot study.

机构信息

Clinica MD Barbantini, Lucca, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jul;46(1):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Treatment for leg oedema conventionally starts with compression bandaging followed by elastic stockings once swelling is reduced. The aim was to investigate if a kit consisting of a liner and outer stocking, each exerting 20 mmHg of pressure, would be equally effective in achieving and maintaining volume reduction compared with short-stretch bandaging (2 weeks) followed by a class II (23-33 mmHg) stocking (2 weeks).

METHODS

Forty legs (28 patients) with chronic venous oedema were randomised to either short-stretch bandages applied weekly for 2 weeks, followed by an elastic stocking for 2 weeks (group A) or a light stocking ("liner") for 1 week followed by superimposing a second stocking for 3 weeks (group B). Interface pressures and leg volumes were measured weekly.

RESULTS

Despite differences in the pressure (median ± interquartile range) applied (bandage: 67 mmHg [55.7-73.0] vs. liner 24.5 mmHg [21.2-26.5]) volume reduction after 1 week was equal (12.8% [8.7-16.5] and 13.0% [10.4-20.6]). After 2 weeks (group A: 17.8% [10.6-20.0] vs. group B 16.2% [13.0-25.4]) and 4 weeks (group A: 17.3% [9.6-22.8] vs. group B: 17.0% [13.1-24.1]) volume reductions remained identical.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial improvement in leg volume (1 week) was independent of the pressure applied and the reduction was maintained by superimposing a second stocking. This offers a simple alternative for managing leg oedema with reduced staffing costs.

摘要

目的/背景:腿部水肿的传统治疗方法是先用压缩绷带包扎,待肿胀减轻后再使用弹性袜。本研究旨在探讨由压力分别为 20mmHg 的衬垫和外袜组成的套件是否与短程绷带包扎(2 周)联合 23-33mmHg 二级压力弹力袜(2 周)同样有效,能达到并维持体积减少。

方法

40 条腿(28 名患者)患有慢性静脉水肿,随机分为每周短程绷带包扎 2 周,然后再用弹性袜包扎 2 周(A 组),或每周使用轻袜(“衬垫”)包扎 1 周,然后再叠加使用 2 周二级压力弹力袜(B 组)。每周测量接口压力和腿部体积。

结果

尽管应用压力(中位数±四分位距)存在差异(绷带:67mmHg[55.7-73.0]与衬垫 24.5mmHg[21.2-26.5]),但 1 周后体积减少量相同(12.8%[8.7-16.5]与 13.0%[10.4-20.6])。2 周后(A 组:17.8%[10.6-20.0]与 B 组 16.2%[13.0-25.4])和 4 周后(A 组:17.3%[9.6-22.8]与 B 组:17.0%[13.1-24.1])体积减少量仍相同。

结论

腿部体积的初始改善(1 周)与应用压力无关,通过叠加第二层袜子来维持减少量。这为管理腿部水肿提供了一种简单的替代方案,可降低人员成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验