Mosti G, Cavezzi A, Partsch H, Urso S, Campana F
Clinica MD Barbantini, Via del Calcio n.2, 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Eurocenter Venalinfa, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):368-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and comfort of inelastic bandages (IBs) and adjustable Velcro compression devices (AVCDs) in reducing venous leg edema in the initial treatment phase.
Forty legs from 36 patients with untreated venous edema (C3EpsAsdPr) were randomized to two groups. Patients in the first group received IBs (n = 20) and those in the second AVCDs (n = 20). Both compression devices were left on the leg day and night, and were renewed after 1 day. Patients in the AVCD group were asked to re-adjust the device as needed when it felt loose. Leg volume was calculated using the truncated cone formula at baseline (T0), after 1 day (T1) and after 7 days (T7). The interface pressure of the two compression devices was measured by an air filled probe, and the static stiffness index calculated after applying compression at T0 and T1, and just before removal of compression on T1 and T7. Patient comfort with regard to the two compression systems was assessed by grading signs and symptoms using a visual analog scale.
At T1, the median percent volume reduction was 13% for the IB group versus 19% for the AVCD group; at T7 it was 19% versus 26%, respectively (p < .001). The pressure of the IBs was significantly higher compared with the AVCDs at T0 (63 vs. 43 mmHg) but dropped by > 50% over time, while it remained unchanged with AVCDs owing to the periodic readjustment by the patient. Comfort was reported to be similar with the two compression devices.
Re-adjustable AVCDs with a resting pressure of around 40 mmHg are more effective in reducing chronic venous edema than IBs with a resting pressure of around 60 mmHg. AVCDs are effective and well tolerated, not only during maintenance therapy, but also in the initial decongestive treatment phase of patients with venous leg edema.
目的/背景:本研究的目的是比较无弹性绷带(IBs)和可调节尼龙搭扣加压装置(AVCDs)在初始治疗阶段减轻下肢静脉水肿方面的疗效和舒适度。
将36例未经治疗的静脉性水肿(C3EpsAsdPr)患者的40条腿随机分为两组。第一组患者使用IBs(n = 20),第二组使用AVCDs(n = 20)。两种加压装置均日夜佩戴在腿上,1天后更换。AVCD组患者在感觉装置松动时需根据需要重新调整。在基线(T0)、1天后(T1)和7天后(T7)使用截头圆锥公式计算腿部体积。使用充气探头测量两种加压装置的界面压力,并在T0和T1施加压力后以及T1和T7即将解除压力前计算静态刚度指数。通过使用视觉模拟量表对体征和症状进行分级来评估患者对两种加压系统的舒适度。
在T1时,IB组的体积减少中位数百分比为13%,而AVCD组为19%;在T7时,分别为19%和26%(p <.001)。在T0时,IBs的压力明显高于AVCDs(63 vs. 43 mmHg),但随着时间推移下降超过50%,而AVCDs由于患者定期重新调整,压力保持不变。据报告,两种加压装置的舒适度相似。
静息压力约为40 mmHg的可重新调节AVCDs在减轻慢性静脉水肿方面比静息压力约为60 mmHg的IBs更有效。AVCDs不仅在维持治疗期间有效且耐受性良好,而且在下肢静脉水肿患者的初始消肿治疗阶段也有效。