Materials Science and Engineering Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Dent Mater. 2013 Jul;29(7):742-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 15.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic occlusal onlay can exhibit a load-bearing capacity that approaches monolithic zirconia, due to a smaller elastic modulus mismatch between the lithium disilicate and its supporting tooth structure relative to zirconia.
Ceramic occlusal onlays of various thicknesses cemented to either enamel or dentin were considered. Occlusal load was applied through an enamel-like deformable indenter or a control rigid indenter. Flexural tensile stress at the ceramic intaglio (cementation) surface-a cause for bulk fracture of occlusal onlays-was rigorously analyzed using finite element analysis and classical plate-on-foundation theory.
When bonded to enamel (supported by dentin), the load-bearing capacity of lithium disilicate can approach 75% of that of zirconia, despite the flexural strength of lithium disilicate (400MPa) being merely 40% of zirconia (1000MPa). When bonded to dentin (with the enamel completely removed), the load-bearing capacity of lithium disilicate is about 57% of zirconia, still significantly higher than the anticipated value based on its strength. Both ceramics show slightly higher load-bearing capacity when loaded with a deformable indenter (enamel, glass-ceramic, or porcelain) rather than a rigid indenter.
When supported by enamel, the load-bearing property of minimally invasive lithium disilicate occlusal onlays (0.6-1.4mm thick) can exceed 70% of that of zirconia. Additionally, a relatively weak dependence of fracture load on restoration thickness indicates that a 1.2mm thin lithium disilicate onlay can be as fracture resistant as its 1.6mm counterpart.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即由于锂硅玻璃陶瓷相对于氧化锆与支持牙齿结构的弹性模量失配更小,整体式锂硅玻璃陶瓷牙颌面嵌体可以表现出接近氧化锆的承载能力。
研究考虑了各种厚度的陶瓷颌面嵌体,分别粘接到牙釉质或牙本质上。通过类似于牙釉质的可变形压头或对照刚性压头施加牙合向载荷。使用有限元分析和经典板基理论,严格分析陶瓷凹面(粘结面)处的弯曲拉伸应力-这是颌面嵌体整体断裂的原因。
当粘接到牙釉质(由牙本质支持)时,尽管锂硅玻璃陶瓷的弯曲强度(400MPa)仅为氧化锆的 40%(1000MPa),但其承载能力可以接近氧化锆的 75%。当粘接到牙本质(完全去除牙釉质)时,锂硅玻璃陶瓷的承载能力约为氧化锆的 57%,仍明显高于其强度预期值。当用可变形压头(牙釉质、玻璃陶瓷或瓷)而不是刚性压头加载时,两种陶瓷的承载能力都略高。
当由牙釉质支撑时,微创式锂硅玻璃陶瓷牙颌面嵌体(0.6-1.4mm 厚)的承载性能可超过氧化锆的 70%。此外,断裂载荷对修复体厚度的相对较弱的依赖性表明,1.2mm 厚的锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体的抗断裂能力与其 1.6mm 厚的嵌体相当。