IRCCS Stella Maris, Scientific Institute of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Calambrone (Pisa), Italy.
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(7):1009-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 14.
Predictors of poor response to treatments in youths with disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs), including conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), are under-studied. Multimodal psychosocial interventions are the best option, but a significant portion of patients needs adjunctive pharmacotherapy. The concept of "psychopathy", and namely, the callous (lack of empathy and guilt) and unemotional (shallow emotions) trait, has been considered a possible specifier indicating a more severe subgroup of patients. We explored whether the callous-unemotional trait (CU) may affect the response to multimodal treatment in referred youths with DBDs.
118 youths (102 males, age range 6-14years, mean age 11.1±2.5years) completed a 12-month multimodal intervention, 48 of whom (41%) needed an associated pharmacotherapy. The patients were assessed according to psychopathological profile (Child Behavior Checklist, CBCL), severity and improvement (Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Improvement scores, CGI-S and CGI-I), functional impairment (Children-Global Assessment Scale, C-GAS), and psychopathic dimension (Antisocial Process Screening Device, APSD), including CU dimension.
58 patients (49.2%) were non-responders. They had more frequently a diagnosis of CD than ODD, presented a comorbid mood disorder, higher CBCL scores in rule-breaking behavior, and higher APSD ("psychopathic") scores. Subjects with higher or lower CU differed only according to the rate of responders (35% vs. 60%, p<.05). The linear blockwise regression indicated that pre-treatment functional impairment (C-GAS) and baseline CU trait were predictors of non-response. The logistic regression indicated that only the value of baseline APSD-CU trait was a predictor of non-response.
A careful assessment of baseline clinical functioning and psychopathological features, namely the psychopathic traits, can identify the most problematic patients, and has specific prognostic and treatment implications.
破坏性行为障碍(DBD)患者,包括品行障碍(CD)和对立违抗性障碍(ODD),其治疗反应不良的预测因素研究较少。多模式心理社会干预是最佳选择,但仍有相当一部分患者需要辅助药物治疗。“精神病态”的概念,即冷酷(缺乏同理心和内疚感)和缺乏情感(情绪浅薄)特征,被认为是可能表明更严重亚组患者的一个特征。我们探讨了冷酷无情特征(CU)是否会影响 DBD 转诊青少年接受多模式治疗的反应。
118 名青少年(102 名男性,年龄 6-14 岁,平均年龄 11.1±2.5 岁)完成了为期 12 个月的多模式干预,其中 48 名(41%)需要辅助药物治疗。根据心理病理学特征(儿童行为检查表,CBCL)、严重程度和改善(临床总体印象严重程度和改善评分,CGI-S 和 CGI-I)、功能障碍(儿童总体评估量表,C-GAS)和精神病态维度(反社会过程筛查装置,APSD)评估患者,包括 CU 维度。
58 名患者(49.2%)为无反应者。他们更频繁地被诊断为 CD,而非 ODD,共患心境障碍,违反规则行为的 CBCL 评分更高,APSD(“精神病态”)评分更高。根据反应率(35%对 60%,p<.05),CU 得分较高或较低的患者仅存在差异。线性逐步回归表明,治疗前功能障碍(C-GAS)和基线 CU 特征是无反应的预测因素。逻辑回归表明,只有基线 APSD-CU 特征值是无反应的预测因素。
仔细评估基线临床功能和心理病理学特征,特别是精神病态特征,可以识别最棘手的患者,并具有特定的预后和治疗意义。