Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Jul;151(3):492-4. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22286. Epub 2013 May 17.
The relationship between the "individualism-collectivism" and the serotonin transporter functional polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), suggested in the previous reports, was tested in Native South Amerindian populations. A total of 170 individuals from 21 populations were genotyped for the 5-HTTLPR alleles. For comparative purposes, these populations were classified as individualistic (recent history of hunter-gathering) or collectivistic (agriculturalists). These two groups showed an almost identical S allele frequency (75 and 76%, respectively). The analysis of molecular variance showed no structural differences between them. Behavioral typologies like those suggested by JY Chiao and KD Blizinsky (Proc R Soc B 277 () 529-537) are always a simplification of complex phenomena and should be regarded with caution. In addition, classification of a whole nation in the individualist/collectivist dichotomy is controversial. The focus on modes of subsistence in preindustrial societies, as was tested here, may be a good alternative although the postulated association between the 5-HTTLPR S allele and the collectivist societies was not confirmed.
先前的报告表明,“个体主义-集体主义”与 5-羟色胺转运体功能多态性(5-HTTLPR)之间存在关联,本研究旨在对南美本土印第安人群进行验证。对来自 21 个群体的 170 个人进行 5-HTTLPR 等位基因分型。为了进行比较,这些群体被分为个体主义(有近期狩猎采集史)或集体主义(农民)。这两个群体的 S 等位基因频率几乎相同(分别为 75%和 76%)。分析显示,它们之间没有结构差异。像 JY Chiao 和 KD Blizinsky 提出的那样的行为类型(Proc R Soc B 277 () 529-537)总是对复杂现象的简化,应该谨慎对待。此外,将整个国家划分为个体主义/集体主义二分法是有争议的。本研究检验了前工业化社会的生存模式,这可能是一个很好的替代方法,尽管没有证实 5-HTTLPR S 等位基因与集体主义社会之间存在假设的关联。