Suppr超能文献

比较两种飞秒激光用于激光原位角膜磨镶术的角膜瓣制作。

Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation.

机构信息

From the Ophthalmic Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.042.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the morphology of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers.

SETTING

Ophthalmic Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, China.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

The RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) device was used to measure the morphology of LASIK flaps created with an Intralase FS60 (Group 1) or Femto LDV (Group 2) femtosecond laser 1 week postoperatively. Nominal flap thickness was 110 μm for both devices.

RESULTS

Group 1 comprised 408 flaps and Group 2, 408 flaps. The mean central flap thickness was 109.34 μm ± 7.57 (SD) in Group 1 and 103.91 ± 6.07 μm in Group 2 (P<.001). The mean flap thickness in Group 2 (105.37 ± 4.56 μm) was significantly thinner than in Group 1 (110.29 ± 6.95 μm) (P<.001). Corneal flaps in the 2 groups were uniform and regular, showing an almost planar configuration. The 2 groups had similar predictability; the mean deviation in flap thickness was 6.59 μm in Group 1 and 6.56 μm in Group 2 (P=.877). The maximum deviation from the intended 110 μm thickness of 18 measurements was 7.1 μm in Group 1 and 7.6 μm in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The flaps in Group 2 were thinner than in Group 1. The 2 groups had similar predictability and uniformity in flap creation.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

摘要

目的

比较两种飞秒激光制作的 LASIK 角膜瓣的形态。

设置

首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科中心、北京眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室,中国北京。

设计

对比病例系列。

方法

使用 RTVue 光学相干断层扫描仪(OCT)于术后 1 周测量应用 Intralase FS60(第 1 组)或 Femto LDV(第 2 组)飞秒激光制作的 LASIK 角膜瓣的形态。两种设备的名义瓣厚度均为 110μm。

结果

第 1 组 408 例,第 2 组 408 例。第 1 组中央瓣厚度的平均值为 109.34μm±7.57(SD),第 2 组为 103.91μm±6.07μm(P<.001)。第 2 组(105.37μm±4.56μm)的瓣厚度明显薄于第 1 组(110.29μm±6.95μm)(P<.001)。两组角膜瓣均规则均匀,呈几乎平面状。两组的预测性相似;第 1 组瓣厚度的平均偏差为 6.59μm,第 2 组为 6.56μm(P=.877)。18 次测量中,与 110μm 名义厚度的最大偏差在第 1 组为 7.1μm,第 2 组为 7.6μm。

结论

第 2 组的瓣比第 1 组薄。两组在角膜瓣制作的可预测性和均匀性方面相似。

无作者在提及的任何材料或方法上具有财务或专有利益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验