Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1879-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
To prospectively compare intraoperative subtraction pachymetry flap thickness measurements and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) flap thickness measurements in eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap creation with a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome.
Stanford Eye Laser Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Comparative case series.
Each patient received wavefront-guided LASIK using an Intralase femtosecond laser in 1 eye and a Hansatome mechanical microkeratome in the fellow eye. Flap morphology was assessed with an ultrasound pachymeter intraoperatively and an AS-OCT system postoperatively at 1 year.
Thirty-six eyes (18 patients) were enrolled. Intraoperative subtraction pachymetry consistently underestimated mechanical microkeratome flap thickness compared with postoperative AS-OCT (P<.001). There was no significant difference between intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative AS-OCT measurements for femtosecond flaps (P=.38). The overall mean variation in flap thickness (ie, mean deviation from targeted flap thickness) was 2.6 μm (range 3 to 11 μm) with the femtosecond laser and 14.2 μm (range 17 to 52 μm) with the mechanical microkeratome (P<.001). Postoperative AS-OCT measurements showed femtosecond flaps had a planar configuration and mechanical microkeratome flaps had a meniscus-shaped configuration.
The femtosecond laser created more uniformly planar flaps than the mechanical microkeratome as measured by intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative AS-OCT. Postoperative AS-OCT measurements varied less than intraoperative subtraction pachymetry measurements for mechanical microkeratome flaps.
Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
前瞻性比较飞秒激光或机械角膜刀行 LASIK 术中角膜瓣厚度的减法测量值与术后眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)瓣厚度的测量值。
美国斯坦福大学医学院斯坦福眼激光中心。
对比病例系列。
每位患者均在一眼接受基于波前像差引导的 Intralase 飞秒激光 LASIK,另一眼接受 Hansatome 机械角膜刀 LASIK。术中应用超声角膜测厚仪,术后 1 年应用 AS-OCT 系统评估角膜瓣形态。
共纳入 36 只眼(18 例患者)。术中角膜减法测量值与术后 AS-OCT 测量值相比,始终低估机械角膜刀角膜瓣厚度(P<.001)。飞秒激光组术中角膜减法测量值与术后 AS-OCT 测量值之间无显著差异(P=.38)。机械角膜刀组角膜瓣厚度的总体平均差异(即,与目标角膜瓣厚度的平均偏差)为 2.6 μm(范围 3 至 11 μm),飞秒激光组为 14.2 μm(范围 17 至 52 μm)(P<.001)。术后 AS-OCT 测量值显示,飞秒激光组的角膜瓣呈平面状,而机械角膜刀组的角膜瓣呈新月形。
与机械角膜刀相比,飞秒激光所制作的角膜瓣更均匀、更规则,这一点通过术中角膜减法测量值和术后 AS-OCT 测量值均可以得到证实。与术中角膜减法测量值相比,机械角膜刀术后 AS-OCT 测量值的变异性更小。
两位作者均无任何与材料或方法相关的经济或财产利益。