Population Mental Health Group, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 18.
Biological conceptualisations of depression are increasingly prevalent. The current study aimed to investigate the current prevalence of causal beliefs about depression in the Australian public, the factors associated with these beliefs, and changes over time.
A nationally representative sample of Australian adults was surveyed as part of the 2011 National Mental Health Literacy and Stigma Survey. Beliefs about the causes of depression were assessed based on responses to vignettes depicting a person with either depression (n=893) or depression with suicidal thoughts (n=903). Socio-demographic characteristics, personal and professional experience with depression, and correct recognition of depression were investigated as predictors of causal beliefs about depression using binary logistic regression. Comparisons were made between the Australian public's current causal beliefs and data obtained in national surveys conducted in 1995 and 2003/4.
Over 80% of the Australian public attributed depression to day to day problems, death of a close friend or relative, a recent traumatic event, childhood problems, and a chemical imbalance in the brain. People who correctly labelled the disorder in the vignettes were more likely to attribute depression to psychosocial reasons and less likely to attribute it to an allergic reaction, a virus, or an infection. Belief in psychosocial and genetic causes has increased over time, whereas belief in infection, allergy and weakness of character has decreased.
Comparisons between the 1995, 2003/4 and 2011 surveys were limited by the differences in the survey methodology at each time point, and by low response rates to the 2003/4 and 2011 surveys. The survey design prevented insight into the reasoning underlying individuals' responses, and lacked sufficient power to explore the beliefs of Australians from cultural minorities.
The majority of the Australian public believe that both psychosocial and biological factors cause depression.
越来越多的人开始从生物学角度来理解抑郁症。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚公众目前对抑郁症病因的看法,以及这些看法的相关因素和随时间的变化。
在 2011 年全国心理健康知识和偏见调查中,对澳大利亚成年人进行了一项全国代表性样本调查。通过对描述一个患有抑郁症(n=893)或伴有自杀念头的抑郁症(n=903)的人的情景描述,评估他们对抑郁症病因的看法。使用二元逻辑回归分析,研究社会人口统计学特征、个人和专业的抑郁经历以及对抑郁的正确识别与对抑郁病因的因果信念之间的关系。将澳大利亚公众目前的因果信念与 1995 年和 2003/4 年进行的全国性调查中获得的数据进行比较。
超过 80%的澳大利亚公众认为,日常生活中的问题、亲密朋友或亲人的去世、最近的创伤性事件、儿童时期的问题以及大脑中的化学失衡都会导致抑郁症。在情景描述中正确识别出这种疾病的人更有可能将抑郁症归因于心理社会原因,而不太可能归因于过敏反应、病毒或感染。人们对心理社会和遗传原因的信念随着时间的推移而增加,而对感染、过敏和性格弱点的信念则有所下降。
1995 年、2003/4 年和 2011 年的调查结果进行比较时,受到每个时间点调查方法的差异以及 2003/4 年和 2011 年调查的低应答率的限制。调查设计无法深入了解个人反应背后的推理,也没有足够的能力来探索澳大利亚文化少数民族的信仰。
大多数澳大利亚公众认为心理社会和生物因素都会导致抑郁症。