• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管穿孔:一项治疗挑战。

Esophageal perforation: a therapeutic challenge.

作者信息

Attar S, Hankins J R, Suter C M, Coughlin T R, Sequeira A, McLaughlin J S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical School and Hospital, Baltimore 21201.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):45-9; discussion 50-1. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90082-h.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(90)90082-h
PMID:2369229
Abstract

The records of 64 patients with esophageal perforation treated since 1958 were reviewed. There were 19 cervical perforations, 44 thoracic perforations, and one abdominal perforation. Thirty-one perforations (48%) were due to injury from intraluminal causes. Twenty (31%) resulted from extraluminal causes: penetrating wounds, 11; blunt trauma, 3; and paraesophageal operations, 6. Eleven (17%) were spontaneous perforations, and two (3%) were caused by perforation of an esophageal malignancy. Ten (91%) of 11 patients with cervical perforations treated less than 24 hours after injury survived compared with 6 (75%) of 8 patients treated more than 24 hours after injury; hence 16 (84%) of the 19 patients in the cervical group survived. In the thoracic group, 19 patients were treated within 24 hours with 16 survivors (84%) compared with 25 patients treated beyond 24 hours with 12 survivors (48%); hence 28 (64%) of the 44 patients in the thoracic group survived. The patient with an abdominal perforation survived. Thirty patients underwent primary suture closure of the perforation, and 25 (83%) lived. Seventeen patients had drainage, and 10 (59%) lived. Total esophagectomy was performed in 9 patients, 7 (78%) of whom survived. Exclusion-diversion procedures were performed in 5 patients, and 1 (20%) survived.

摘要

回顾了自1958年以来接受治疗的64例食管穿孔患者的记录。其中有19例颈部穿孔、44例胸部穿孔和1例腹部穿孔。31例穿孔(48%)是由腔内原因导致的损伤引起。20例(31%)是由腔外原因导致:穿透伤11例;钝性创伤3例;食管旁手术6例。11例(17%)为自发性穿孔,2例(3%)是由食管恶性肿瘤穿孔引起。11例颈部穿孔患者中,受伤后24小时内接受治疗的10例(91%)存活,而受伤后24小时以上接受治疗的8例患者中有6例(75%)存活;因此,颈部组19例患者中有16例(84%)存活。在胸部组中,19例患者在24小时内接受治疗,16例存活(84%),而24小时后接受治疗的25例患者中有12例存活(48%);因此,胸部组44例患者中有28例(64%)存活。腹部穿孔的患者存活。30例患者对穿孔进行了一期缝合,25例(83%)存活。17例患者进行了引流,10例(59%)存活。9例患者进行了全食管切除术,其中7例(78%)存活。5例患者进行了旷置转流手术,1例(20%)存活。

相似文献

1
Esophageal perforation: a therapeutic challenge.食管穿孔:一项治疗挑战。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):45-9; discussion 50-1. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90082-h.
2
Diagnosis and management of esophageal perforations.食管穿孔的诊断与处理
Am Surg. 1992 Feb;58(2):112-9.
3
Surgical management of esophageal perforation.食管穿孔的外科治疗
Am Surg. 1987 Apr;53(4):183-91.
4
[The value of conservative therapy, surgical treatment and interventional radiology in perforations and ruptures of the esophagus].[保守治疗、手术治疗及介入放射学在食管穿孔和破裂中的价值]
Helv Chir Acta. 1993 Sep;60(1-2):11-5.
5
[Perforations of the esophagus].
Presse Med. 1986 Mar 29;15(13):607-10.
6
Esophageal disruption from blunt and penetrating external trauma.
Arch Surg. 1976 Jun;111(6):663-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360240043007.
7
Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair?伴有纵隔感染的迟发性食管穿孔的治疗。食管切除术还是一期修复?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Dec;106(6):1088-91.
8
Operative and nonoperative management of esophageal perforations.食管穿孔的手术及非手术治疗
Ann Surg. 1981 Jul;194(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00010.
9
Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation.对57例连续性食管穿孔患者的个体化管理。
Am J Surg. 2004 Jan;187(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.11.004.
10
Options in the management of perforations of the esophagus.
Am J Surg. 1986 Jul;152(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90144-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Esophageal perforation with mediastinitis leading to mycotic aortic pseudoaneurysm in a pediatric patient: A complication of sharp foreign body ingestion.一名儿科患者因食管穿孔合并纵隔炎导致霉菌性主动脉假性动脉瘤:尖锐异物吞食的一种并发症。
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2025 Aug 11;13:2050313X251366363. doi: 10.1177/2050313X251366363. eCollection 2025.
2
Oesophageal Perforation Surgical Treatment: What Affects the Outcome? A Multicenter Experience.食管穿孔的外科治疗:哪些因素影响治疗结果?一项多中心经验。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4019. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124019.
3
The outcome of esophageal perforation in neonates and its risk factors: a 10-year study.
新生儿食管穿孔的结局及其危险因素:一项 10 年研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Feb 15;39(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05417-x.
4
Stem-cell therapy gastroscopy improves the outcome of esophageal anastomotic leakage.干细胞疗法胃镜检查可改善食管吻合口漏的治疗效果。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 20;12:1077024. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1077024. eCollection 2022.
5
Two-stage surgery for delayed esophageal perforation and concomitant chylothorax secondary to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.两阶段手术治疗上消化道内镜检查后延迟性食管穿孔并伴有乳糜胸
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 12;77:103623. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103623. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Prognostic factors of esophageal perforation and rupture leading to mortality: a retrospective study.食管穿孔和破裂导致死亡的预后因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 9;16(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01680-y.
7
Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children.小儿食管穿孔与EVAC:四例儿童病例系列
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 6;9:727472. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.727472. eCollection 2021.
8
The insidious presentation and challenging management of esophageal perforation following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.诊断和治疗性干预后食管穿孔的隐匿性表现及具有挑战性的处理
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2724-2734. doi: 10.21037/jtd-19-4096.
9
Esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for benign disease: extreme but important.采用胃代食管重建术治疗良性疾病:虽极端但重要。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):117. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.14.
10
Primary repair of a delayed presentation thoracic oesophageal gunshot injury: A report of two cases.延迟就诊的胸段食管枪伤的一期修复:两例报告
Trauma Case Rep. 2017 Nov 7;12:45-47. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2017.10.018. eCollection 2017 Dec.