Suppr超能文献

两种布局对失语症患者高科技辅助沟通设备导航及内容定位的影响。

Effect of two layouts on high technology AAC navigation and content location by people with aphasia.

作者信息

Wallace Sarah E, Hux Karen

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh , PA , USA and.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Mar;9(2):173-82. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.799237. Epub 2013 May 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Navigating high-technology augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices with dynamic displays can be challenging for people with aphasia. The purpose of this study was to determine which of two AAC interfaces two people with aphasia could use most efficiently and accurately.

METHOD

The researchers used a BCB'C' alternating treatment design to provide device-use instruction to two people with severe aphasia regarding two personalised AAC interfaces that had different navigation layouts but identical content. One interface had static buttons for homepage and go-back features, and the other interface had static buttons in a navigation ring layout. Throughout treatment, the researchers monitored participants' mastery patterns regarding navigation efficiency and accuracy when locating target messages.

RESULTS

Participants' accuracy and efficiency improved with both interfaces given intervention; however, the navigation ring layout appeared more transparent and better facilitated navigation than the homepage layout.

CONCLUSIONS

People with aphasia can learn to navigate computerised devices; however, interface layout can substantially affect the efficiency and accuracy with which they locate messages.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

Given intervention incorporating errorless learning principles, people with chronic aphasia can learn to navigate across multiple device levels to locate target sentences. Both navigation ring and homepage interfaces may be used by people with aphasia. Some people with aphasia may be more consistent and efficient in finding target sentences using the navigation ring interface than the homepage interface. Additionally, the navigation ring interface may be more transparent and easier for people with aphasia to master--that is, they may require fewer intervention sessions to learn to navigate the navigation ring interface. Generalisation of learning may result from use of the navigation ring interface. Specifically, people with aphasia may improve navigation with the homepage interface as a result of instruction on the navigation interface, but not vice versa.

摘要

目的

对于失语症患者而言,操作配备动态显示屏的高科技辅助和替代沟通(AAC)设备具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定两名失语症患者能够最有效、准确地使用的两种AAC界面中的哪一种。

方法

研究人员采用BCB'C'交替治疗设计,就两个具有不同导航布局但内容相同的个性化AAC界面,向两名重度失语症患者提供设备使用指导。一个界面有用于主页和返回功能的静态按钮,另一个界面的静态按钮呈导航环布局。在整个治疗过程中,研究人员监测参与者在定位目标信息时的导航效率和准确性方面的掌握模式。

结果

在接受干预的情况下,两个界面的参与者的准确性和效率均有所提高;然而,导航环布局似乎比主页布局更清晰,更便于导航。

结论

失语症患者可以学习操作计算机化设备;然而,界面布局会极大地影响他们定位信息的效率和准确性。

对康复的启示

通过纳入无错误学习原则的干预,慢性失语症患者可以学习跨多个设备级别进行导航以定位目标句子。失语症患者可以使用导航环和主页界面。一些失语症患者使用导航环界面查找目标句子可能比使用主页界面更连贯、高效。此外,导航环界面可能对失语症患者来说更清晰、更容易掌握——也就是说,他们可能需要更少的干预课程来学习操作导航环界面。学习的泛化可能源于导航环界面的使用。具体而言,失语症患者可能会因导航界面的指导而提高使用主页界面的导航能力,但反之则不然。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验