• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌缺血对稳定型缺血性心脏病心肌血运重建的影响。来自COURAGE和FAME 2试验的经验教训。

Impact of myocardial ischemia on myocardial revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease. Lessons from the COURAGE and FAME 2 trials.

作者信息

Torosoff M T, Sidhu M S, Boden W E

机构信息

Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

出版信息

Herz. 2013 Jun;38(4):382-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3824-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-013-3824-0
PMID:23695652
Abstract

In patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), myocardial revascularization should be performed to either improve survival or improve symptoms and functional status among patients who are not well controlled with optimal medical therapy (OMT). A general consensus exists on the core elements of OMT, which include both lifestyle intervention and intensive secondary prevention with proven pharmacotherapies. By contrast, however, there is less general agreement as to what constitutes the optimal approach to revascularization in SIHD patients. The COURAGE and FAME 2 randomized trials form the foundation of the current clinical evidence base and raise the important question: "What is the impact of myocardial ischemia on myocardial revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease?"

摘要

对于稳定型缺血性心脏病(SIHD)患者,应进行心肌血运重建,以改善生存率,或改善症状及功能状态,这些患者在接受最佳药物治疗(OMT)后病情仍未得到良好控制。对于OMT的核心要素已达成普遍共识,其中包括生活方式干预以及采用经证实的药物疗法进行强化二级预防。然而,相比之下,对于SIHD患者的最佳血运重建方法尚无普遍共识。COURAGE试验和FAME 2随机试验构成了当前临床证据基础,并提出了一个重要问题:“心肌缺血对稳定型缺血性心脏病患者心肌血运重建有何影响?”

相似文献

1
Impact of myocardial ischemia on myocardial revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease. Lessons from the COURAGE and FAME 2 trials.心肌缺血对稳定型缺血性心脏病心肌血运重建的影响。来自COURAGE和FAME 2试验的经验教训。
Herz. 2013 Jun;38(4):382-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3824-0.
2
Strategies in stable ischemic heart disease: lessons from the COURAGE and BARI-2D trials.稳定性缺血性心脏病的策略: COURAGE 和 BARI-2D 试验的经验教训。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010 Nov;12(6):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s11883-010-0135-2.
3
[Diagnostics and therapy of chronic myocardial ischemia: the when and how of diagnostic work-up and therapy].[慢性心肌缺血的诊断与治疗:诊断检查及治疗的时机与方法]
Herz. 2013 Jun;38(4):327-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3825-z.
4
Lessons learned from MPI and physiologic testing in randomized trials of stable ischemic heart disease: COURAGE, BARI 2D, FAME, and ISCHEMIA.从稳定型缺血性心脏病随机试验中的 MPI 和生理测试中吸取的经验教训: COURAGE、BARI 2D、FAME 和 ISCHEMIA。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9773-4.
5
Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.糖尿病合并稳定型缺血性心脏病患者的血运重建策略:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022 Apr 1;23(4):242-246. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001285.
6
Revascularization options in stable coronary artery disease: it is not how to revascularize, it is whether and when to revascularize.稳定型冠状动脉疾病的血运重建选择:关键不在于如何进行血运重建,而在于是否以及何时进行血运重建。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):505-14. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.37. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Hypotheses, rationale, design, and methods for prognostic evaluation of a randomized comparison between patients with coronary artery disease associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy who undergo medical or surgical treatment: MASS-VI (HF).冠心病合并缺血性心肌病患者接受药物或手术治疗的随机对照预后评估的假设、理论依据、设计及方法:MASS-VI(心力衰竭)研究
Trials. 2020 Apr 16;21(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04270-w.
8
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
9
Clinical Implications and Debates on the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches Trial.国际医学与有创治疗比较健康效果研究的临床意义与争议
Cardiol Rev. 2022;30(5):234-240. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000389. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
10
Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes.慢性肾脏病对糖尿病患者血运重建治疗结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 5;73(4):400-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.044.

引用本文的文献

1
Protein lysine acetylation does not contribute to the high rates of fatty acid oxidation seen in the post-ischemic heart.蛋白赖氨酸乙酰化作用不会导致缺血后心脏中观察到的脂肪酸氧化率升高。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51571-0.
2
The ISCHEMIA Trial: What is the Message for the Interventionalist?缺血性心脏病优化药物治疗与介入治疗比较研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:对介入治疗医生有何启示?
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;16:e24. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.37. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Rosuvastatin relieves myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by upregulating PPAR‑γ and UCP2.

本文引用的文献

1
2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2012年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组、美国内科医师学会、美国胸外科协会、预防心血管护士协会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科协会关于稳定型缺血性心脏病患者诊断和管理的指南:一份报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):e44-e164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
2
Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes.多血管血运重建策略在糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
瑞舒伐他汀通过上调 PPAR-γ 和 UCP2 缓解心肌缺血/再灌注损伤。
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Jul;18(1):789-798. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9062. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention is not a valid concept.血流储备分数引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并非一个有效的概念。
Circulation. 2014 May 6;129(18):1871-8; discussion 1878. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003583.
5
[Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease. Coronary revascularization after FREEDOM].糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术比较。FREEDOM研究后的冠状动脉血运重建
Herz. 2014 May;39(3):331-42. doi: 10.1007/s00059-014-4089-y.
3
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.临界血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠心病的药物治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
Which is more enduring--FAME or COURAGE?哪个更持久——名誉还是勇气?
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):1059-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1208620. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
5
Baseline stress myocardial perfusion imaging results and outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease randomized to optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.基线应激心肌灌注成像结果及稳定性缺血性心脏病患者的预后随机分为最佳药物治疗联合或不联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Am Heart J. 2012 Aug;164(2):243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.018.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠状动脉疾病最佳药物治疗的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):476-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970954. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
7
Impact of left ventricular function and the extent of ischemia and scar by stress myocardial perfusion imaging on prognosis and therapeutic risk reduction in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial.应激心肌灌注显像评估左心室功能、缺血及瘢痕范围对合并冠心病的糖尿病患者预后和治疗风险降低的影响:来自冠状动脉旁路移植血管成形术血运重建治疗 2 型糖尿病(BARI 2D)试验的结果。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):658-69. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9548-3. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
8
Weighing the evidence for decision making about percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease.权衡稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗决策的证据
Circulation. 2012 Apr 17;125(15):1827-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.100669. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
9
Comparative outcomes for patients who do and do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease in New York.纽约稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与未行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较结果。
Circulation. 2012 Apr 17;125(15):1870-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071811. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
10
Mounting evidence for lack of PCI benefit in stable ischemic heart disease : what more will it take to turn the tide of treatment?: comment on "initial coronary stent implantation with medical therapy vs medical therapy alone for stable coronary artery disease".稳定型缺血性心脏病患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)无获益的证据越来越多:要扭转治疗趋势还需要什么?:对“稳定型冠状动脉疾病初始冠状动脉支架植入联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗对比”的评论
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 27;172(4):319-21. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2321.