Suppr超能文献

孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术和孕早期绒毛取样用于多胎妊娠产前诊断后的结局

Outcome after second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.

作者信息

Enzensberger C, Pulvermacher C, Degenhardt J, Kawecki A, Germer U, Weichert J, Krapp M, Gembruch U, Axt-Fliedner R

机构信息

OB&GYN, Division of Prenatal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen.

German Center for Fetal Surgery & Minimally Invasive Therapy (DZFT), Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen.

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 2014 Apr;35(2):166-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330700. Epub 2013 May 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to classify pregnancy loss and fetal loss as well as the influence of maternal risk factors in multiple pregnancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Details of the procedure and pregnancy outcome of all patients were extracted from the clinical audit database of two tertiary centers. The files were collected in the time from January 1993 to May 2011.  The procedure-related pregnancy and fetal loss rate was classified as all unplanned abortions without important fetal abnormalities or obstetric complications within 14 days after AC and CVS.

RESULTS

We had a total number of 288 multiple pregnancies with a total of 637 fetuses. After the exclusion of 112 pregnancies with abnormal karyotype or fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasound as well as cases of selective feticide, repeated invasive procedures and monochorionic-monoamniotic pregnancies, 176 pregnancies and 380 fetuses were left for final analysis. Overall 132 amniocenteses and 44 chorionic villous sampling procedures were performed. The total pregnancy loss rate was 8.0 % (14/176), 6.1 % (n = 8) for amniocentesis and 13.6 % (n = 6) for CVS.  The procedure-related pregnancy loss rate was 3.4 %, 2.3 % after amniocentesis (3 cases) and 6.8 % after CVS (3 cases). There was no statistical significance between the two procedures (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

The procedure-related loss rate of 3.4 % can be compared to the rates in the literature. The higher loss rates in multiple pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies have to be discussed when counseling parents.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对多胎妊娠中的妊娠丢失和胎儿丢失进行分类,并探讨母体风险因素的影响。

方法和材料

从两个三级中心的临床审计数据库中提取所有患者的手术细节和妊娠结局。文件收集时间为1993年1月至2011年5月。将与手术相关的妊娠和胎儿丢失率定义为在羊膜腔穿刺术(AC)和绒毛取样术(CVS)后14天内所有无重要胎儿异常或产科并发症的意外流产。

结果

我们共有288例多胎妊娠,共637个胎儿。排除112例染色体核型异常或超声检测到胎儿异常的妊娠,以及选择性减胎、重复侵入性操作和单绒毛膜单羊膜囊妊娠的病例后,剩余176例妊娠和380个胎儿进行最终分析。共进行了132例羊膜腔穿刺术和44例绒毛取样术。总妊娠丢失率为8.0%(14/176),羊膜腔穿刺术为6.1%(n = 8),绒毛取样术为13.6%(n = 6)。与手术相关的妊娠丢失率为3.4%,羊膜腔穿刺术后为2.3%(3例),绒毛取样术后为6.8%(3例)。两种手术之间无统计学意义(p = 0.15)。

结论

与手术相关的3.4%的丢失率可与文献中的率相比较。在为父母提供咨询时,必须讨论多胎妊娠中比单胎妊娠更高的丢失率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验