• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠行羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛活检术的产科结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 May 13;34(18):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142.
2
Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.双胎妊娠行羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛取样术后的胎儿丢失风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):647-655. doi: 10.1002/uog.22143. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Obstetrical outcomes after first-trimester chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancies: A retrospective case-control study.双胎妊娠孕早期绒毛取样后的产科结局:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Aug;45(8):1466-1471. doi: 10.1111/jog.13993. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.侵入性产前检测后的胎儿丢失:经腹绒毛取样、经宫颈绒毛取样与羊膜腔穿刺术的比较
J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):193-198. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0434.
5
Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.双胎妊娠的产前诊断:孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术与孕早期绒毛取样的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):49-56.
6
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样术在双胎妊娠中的应用:哪种是最佳的取样技术?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):365.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.016. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.绒毛取样用于细胞遗传学异常早期产前诊断的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001.
8
Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.中期妊娠羊膜腔穿刺术与绒毛取样术在多胎妊娠产前诊断中的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;20(5):476-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00826.x.
9
Outcome after second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术和孕早期绒毛取样用于多胎妊娠产前诊断后的结局
Ultraschall Med. 2014 Apr;35(2):166-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330700. Epub 2013 May 21.
10
Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study.绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术后的总妊娠丢失:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):599-606. doi: 10.1002/uog.15986.

引用本文的文献

1
Amniocentesis and Risk of Fetal Loss in Dichorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study.双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠的羊膜腔穿刺术与胎儿丢失风险:一项病例对照研究
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jun;45(6):713-719. doi: 10.1002/pd.6777. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.双胎妊娠的羊膜腔穿刺术:胎儿丢失的危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1937. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071937.

本文引用的文献

1
Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to maternal age.根据母亲年龄的双胎妊娠围产期结局
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Mar;62(2):93-102. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.93. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.用于产前诊断的羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 4;9(9):CD003252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.
3
Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.侵入性产前检测后的胎儿丢失:经腹绒毛取样、经宫颈绒毛取样与羊膜腔穿刺术的比较
J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):193-198. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0434.
4
Perinatal Outcome of Discordant Anomalous Twins: A Single-Center Experience in a Developing Country.不一致性异常双胎的围产期结局:发展中国家的单中心经验
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Aug;19(4):389-92. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.42. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
5
Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study.绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术后的总妊娠丢失:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):599-606. doi: 10.1002/uog.15986.
6
Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies.孕早期唐氏综合征联合筛查后进行侵入性检测相关的胎儿丢失风险:147,987例单胎妊娠的全国队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;47(1):38-44. doi: 10.1002/uog.15820.
7
Chorionic Villus Sampling in Assisted Versus Spontaneous Conception Twins.辅助受孕与自然受孕的双胞胎绒毛取样。
Ultraschall Med. 2017 Aug;38(4):437-442. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-108566. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Pregnancy outcome after fetal reduction in women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy.双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠减胎术后的妊娠结局。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1807-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev132. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
9
Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样术后与操作相关的流产风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;45(1):16-26. doi: 10.1002/uog.14636.
10
The outcome of twin pregnancies discordant for trisomy 21.21三体综合征不一致的双胎妊娠结局。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;17(1):38-44. doi: 10.1017/thg.2013.79. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠行羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛活检术的产科结局。

Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2019 May 13;34(18):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142
PMID:31074255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Under certain situations, women with twin pregnancies may be counseled to undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic testing. Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis are the two generally performed invasive prenatal diagnostic tests. Studies comparing procedure-related fetal loss between first-trimester chorionic villus sampling and second-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedure-related fetal loss and the obstetrical outcomes of these two procedures, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

The data from dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies on which first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (n = 54) or second-trimester amniocentesis (n = 170) was performed between December 2006 and January 2017 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure-related fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses within 4 weeks of procedure, and overall fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses during the gestation. The groups were compared with respect to the procedure-related and obstetrical outcomes.

RESULTS

The difference in proportion of procedure-related fetal loss rate (1.9% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 1.8% for amniocentesis; = 1.000) and the overall fetal loss rate (7.4% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 4.7% for amniocentesis; = 0.489) between the two groups was not significant. The mean gestational ages at delivery were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Both the overall fetal loss rate and the procedure-related fetal loss rate of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in dichorionic twin pregnancies had no statistical significance. Both procedures can be safely used individually.

摘要

背景

在某些情况下,双胎妊娠的女性可能会接受有创性产前诊断检测。绒毛膜绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术是两种常用的有创性产前诊断检测。比较双胎妊娠中早孕期绒毛膜绒毛取样与中孕期羊膜穿刺术与相关胎儿丢失的研究有限。本研究旨在评估这两种方法(双胎妊娠中早孕期绒毛膜绒毛取样和中孕期羊膜穿刺术)与相关胎儿丢失和产科结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 12 月至 2017 年 1 月期间在一家中心进行的双绒毛膜-双羊膜性双胎妊娠早孕期绒毛膜绒毛取样(n=54)或中孕期羊膜穿刺术(n=170)的资料。将与操作相关的胎儿丢失定义为操作后 4 周内丢失一个或所有胎儿,总体胎儿丢失定义为妊娠期间丢失一个或所有胎儿。比较两组的与操作相关和产科结局。

结果

绒毛膜绒毛取样组与羊膜穿刺术组的与操作相关的胎儿丢失率(1.9%比 1.8%;=1.000)和总体胎儿丢失率(7.4%比 4.7%;=0.489)差异无统计学意义。两组的分娩时平均孕龄无统计学差异。

结论

双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠中绒毛膜绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术的总体胎儿丢失率和与操作相关的胎儿丢失率均无统计学意义。两种方法均可单独安全使用。