Weller Stephen, Jones Lori S, Lou Yu, Piscitelli Stephen, Peppercorn Amanda, Ng-Cashin Judith
GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Antivir Ther. 2013;18(6):827-30. doi: 10.3851/IMP2631. Epub 2013 May 21.
During a pandemic, the need for available anti-influenza medications increases. There has been extensive use of the approved zanamivir Rotadisk/Diskhaler but no clinical data are available for administration by an alternative Rotacap/Rotahaler presentation.
In this randomized three-way crossover study, each healthy adult received zanamivir 10 mg every 12 h for 5 days via Rotadisk/Diskhaler, via Rotacap/Rotahaler and placebo via Rotacap/Rotahaler, with a washout period between treatments. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study and at follow-up. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected over a 12-h dose interval on day 5 of each treatment period. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using a mixed-effects model.
A total of 18 healthy adults were recruited and 17 subjects completed the study. A total of 20 adverse events (AEs) were reported (all grade 1) by nine subjects, with no AE reported ≥1× in any treatment group. Nasal congestion, reported by one subject in the zanamivir Rotadisk/Diskhaler group, was the only drug-related AE. No serious AEs or withdrawals due to AEs occurred during the study. There were no significant changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs or spirometry. Serum zanamivir exposures were similar after administration via Rotacap/Rotahaler and Rotadisk/Diskhaler. Both oral inhalation presentations are likely to deliver similar zanamivir concentrations to sites of influenza infection in the respiratory tract.
The safety and pharmacokinetic results from this study support the use of the Rotacap/Rotahaler presentation, potentially allowing an increased number of zanamivir treatment courses to be supplied in the event of an influenza pandemic.
在大流行期间,对抗流感药物的需求增加。已广泛使用已获批的扎那米韦吸入粉雾剂/准纳器,但尚无关于使用替代的吸入硬胶囊/吸入器剂型给药的临床数据。
在这项随机三向交叉研究中,每位健康成年人通过吸入粉雾剂/准纳器、吸入硬胶囊/吸入器以及通过吸入硬胶囊/吸入器给予安慰剂,每12小时接受10毫克扎那米韦,共5天,各治疗之间有洗脱期。在整个研究过程中和随访时进行安全性评估。在每个治疗期的第5天,在12小时的给药间隔内采集系列血样进行药代动力学分析。使用混合效应模型比较药代动力学参数。
共招募了18名健康成年人,17名受试者完成了研究。9名受试者共报告了20起不良事件(均为1级),任何治疗组均未报告不良事件≥1次。扎那米韦吸入粉雾剂/准纳器组的1名受试者报告了鼻塞,这是唯一与药物相关的不良事件。研究期间未发生严重不良事件或因不良事件而退出研究的情况。临床实验室值、生命体征或肺功能测定均无显著变化。通过吸入硬胶囊/吸入器和吸入粉雾剂/准纳器给药后,血清扎那米韦暴露量相似。两种口服吸入剂型可能会将相似的扎那米韦浓度递送至呼吸道流感感染部位。
本研究的安全性和药代动力学结果支持使用吸入硬胶囊/吸入器剂型,在流感大流行时可能允许提供更多的扎那米韦治疗疗程。