Suppr超能文献

吸入扎那米韦与金刚乙胺用于控制高接种率长期护理人群中的流感

Inhaled zanamivir versus rimantadine for the control of influenza in a highly vaccinated long-term care population.

作者信息

Gravenstein Stefan, Drinka Paul, Osterweil Dan, Schilling Margo, Krause Peggy, Elliott Michael, Shult Peter, Ambrozaitis Arvydas, Kandel Ruth, Binder Ellen, Hammond Janet, McElhaney Janet, Flack Nancy, Daly Janet, Keene Oliver

机构信息

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;6(6):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.08.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite vaccination, influenza commonly causes morbidity and mortality in institutional settings. Influenza control with rimantadine and amantadine is limited by emergence and transmission of drug-resistant influenza A variants, ineffectiveness against influenza B, and toxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of zanamivir versus rimantadine for influenza outbreak control in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, controlled study prospectively enrolled nursing home residents for 3 influenza seasons (1997 to 2000). Vaccine was offered to all subjects. Following influenza outbreak declaration, subjects were randomized to inhaled zanamivir 10 mg or standard of care (rimantadine 100 mg for influenza A or placebo for influenza B) once daily for 14 days. The proportion of randomized subjects developing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza during prophylaxis was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of 482 randomizations (238 zanamivir, 231 rimantadine, 13 placebo), 96% of subjects were elderly or had high-risk conditions; over 90% were vaccinated. Symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza occurred in 3% of zanamivir subjects and 8% of rimantadine subjects during chemoprophylaxis (P = .038; additional protective efficacy for zanamivir over rimantadine = 61%). Since only 25 subjects were randomized during 2 influenza B outbreaks and none developed influenza, the influenza B data were excluded from further analysis. Zanamivir was well tolerated and unassociated with emergence of resistant virus; rimantadine-resistant variants were common.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective, controlled study demonstrating effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis for influenza outbreak control. Zanamivir prevents symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza more effectively than rimantadine, is unassociated with resistant virus, and has a favorable safety profile. Zanamivir is an appropriate alternative for influenza outbreak control among institutionalized vaccinated elderly.

摘要

背景

尽管接种了疫苗,但流感仍常在机构环境中导致发病和死亡。用金刚乙胺和金刚烷胺控制流感受到耐药甲型流感病毒变种的出现和传播、对乙型流感无效以及毒性的限制。本研究评估了扎那米韦与金刚乙胺在长期护理机构中控制流感暴发的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这项双盲、随机、对照研究前瞻性地纳入了养老院居民,为期3个流感季节(1997年至2000年)。为所有受试者提供了疫苗。在宣布流感暴发后,受试者被随机分为吸入10毫克扎那米韦组或标准治疗组(甲型流感用100毫克金刚乙胺,乙型流感用安慰剂),每日一次,共14天。预防期间出现有症状的、实验室确诊的流感的随机分组受试者比例为主要终点。

结果

在482次随机分组中(238例扎那米韦,231例金刚乙胺,13例安慰剂),96%的受试者为老年人或有高危情况;超过90%的受试者接种了疫苗。在化学预防期间,3%的扎那米韦组受试者和8%的金刚乙胺组受试者出现了有症状的、实验室确诊的流感(P = 0.038;扎那米韦相对于金刚乙胺的额外保护效力 = 61%)。由于在2次乙型流感暴发期间只有25名受试者被随机分组,且无人患流感,因此乙型流感数据被排除在进一步分析之外。扎那米韦耐受性良好,与耐药病毒的出现无关;金刚乙胺耐药变种很常见。

结论

这是第一项前瞻性对照研究,证明了化学预防对控制流感暴发的有效性。扎那米韦比金刚乙胺更有效地预防有症状的、实验室确诊的流感,与耐药病毒无关,且具有良好的安全性。扎那米韦是机构化接种疫苗的老年人控制流感暴发的合适替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验