Suppr超能文献

吸入扎那米韦与安慰剂预防未接种疫苗的长期护理人群流感暴发的比较。

Inhaled zanamivir versus placebo for the prevention of influenza outbreaks in an unvaccinated long-term care population.

作者信息

Ambrozaitis Arvydas, Gravenstein Stefan, van Essen Gerrit A, Rubinstein Ethan, Balciuniene Ligita, Stikleryte Ausra, Crawford Catriona, Elliott Michael, Shult Peter

机构信息

Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;6(6):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.08.007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antiviral chemoprophylaxis effectiveness for influenza control has not been prospectively established for unvaccinated residents of long-term care facilities. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of zanamivir against the standard of care (no intervention, ie, placebo) for influenza outbreak control in a largely unvaccinated institutionalized population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zanamivir versus placebo for influenza outbreak control in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study prospectively enrolled/followed residents of long-term care facilities (LTCF) at 12 centers for 1 to 3 influenza seasons (1997 to 2000). Following influenza outbreak declaration, asymptomatic subjects were randomized for prophylaxis to inhaled zanamivir 10 mg or inhaled placebo given once daily for 14 days. The proportion of randomized subjects who during prophylaxis developed symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza (SLCI) was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Influenza outbreaks were explosive. The attack rates varied from 9.5 to 14.8 per 100 residents. Of 1763 consents given and resulting in 494 randomizations, 49% received zanamivir and 51% placebo; 66% were elderly and 9% were vaccinated. SLCI occurred in 6% of zanamivir and 9% of placebo subjects (P = .355; protective efficacy for zanamivir = 29%, 95% confidence interval 31% to 62%), and symptomatic influenza confirmed by culture in 2% and 6%, respectively (P = .052; protective efficacy = 65%, 95% confidence interval 8.5% to 86%). Zanamivir use was also associated with a 70% (95% confidence interval 13% to 89%) reduction in laboratory-confirmed influenza with fever (2% vs 6%, P = .043). Influenza B was not detected. Zanamivir was well tolerated. No virus isolate demonstrated zanamivir resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective efficacy of zanamivir versus placebo for SLCI was marginal, for all laboratory confirmed illnesses, but significant against culture proven and febrile influenza, suggesting zanamivir can be effective for outbreak control and symptom reduction of unvaccinated institutionalized residents. Zanamivir had an acceptable safety profile in elderly, high-risk LTCF residents and was not associated with the emergence of resistant strains.

摘要

背景

对于长期护理机构中未接种疫苗的居民,抗病毒化学预防对流感控制的有效性尚未经过前瞻性研究证实。本研究评估了扎那米韦相对于护理标准(无干预,即安慰剂)在控制流感暴发方面的疗效和耐受性,研究对象主要是未接种疫苗的机构化人群。

目的

评估扎那米韦与安慰剂相比在长期护理机构中控制流感暴发的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究前瞻性地纳入/随访了12个中心的长期护理机构(LTCF)居民,为期1至3个流感季节(1997年至2000年)。在宣布流感暴发后,将无症状的受试者随机分为两组,一组接受每日一次吸入10毫克扎那米韦进行预防,另一组接受吸入安慰剂,疗程均为14天。主要终点是在预防期间出现有症状、实验室确诊流感(SLCI)的随机分组受试者的比例。

结果

流感暴发具有爆发性。发病率为每100名居民9.5至14.8例。在1763份同意书并导致494例随机分组中,49%接受扎那米韦,51%接受安慰剂;66%为老年人,9%接种过疫苗。扎那米韦组6%的受试者和安慰剂组9%的受试者出现SLCI(P = 0.355;扎那米韦的保护效力 = 29%,95%置信区间为31%至62%),通过培养确诊的有症状流感分别为2%和6%(P = 0.052;保护效力 = 65%,95%置信区间为8.5%至86%)。使用扎那米韦还使实验室确诊的伴有发热的流感减少了70%(95%置信区间为13%至89%)(2%对6%,P = 0.043)。未检测到乙型流感。扎那米韦耐受性良好。没有病毒分离株显示出对扎那米韦耐药。

结论

扎那米韦与安慰剂相比,对SLCI的保护效力有限,但对所有实验室确诊疾病有效,对培养确诊和发热性流感有显著效果,这表明扎那米韦可有效控制未接种疫苗的机构化居民的流感暴发并减轻症状。扎那米韦在老年、高危的长期护理机构居民中具有可接受的安全性,且与耐药菌株的出现无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验