Johns T G, Kerry J A, Veitch B A, Mackay I R, Tutton P J, Tymms M J, Cheetham B F, Hertzog P J, Linnane A W
Centre for Molecular Biology & Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Cancer Res. 1990 Aug 1;50(15):4718-23.
The pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, cell localization, and penetration into tumor xenografts of recombinant [35S]methionine-labeled human alpha interferon (HuIFN-alpha) and murine alpha interferon (MuIFN-alpha) were examined in mice. Both interferons (IFNs) were removed from the blood in a rapid biphasic manner; HuIFN-alpha was cleared faster than MuIFN-alpha. Tissues were analyzed for radioactivity and over 90% of the IFNs was accounted for. The IFNs were detected predominantly in liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, spleen, and lung. The levels of MuIFN-alpha compared with HuIFN-alpha were greater in the liver, spleen, and lung and less in the kidney, pancreas, and gastrointestinal tract. Heart, brain, testes, thymus, lymph nodes, fat, skin, and skeletal muscle contained much lower but measurable levels of both IFNs. There was penetration of HuIFN-alpha into tumor xenografts. The pharmacokinetics of IFN-alpha were independent of the strain of mouse, BALB/c or CBA, immune deprivation, or the presence of a tumor xenograft. Autoradiography of tissue sections from mice given injections of HuIFN-alpha or MuIFN-alpha indicated focal radioactivity in proximal convoluted tubules in the kidney and diffuse radioactivity in the liver, gastrointestinal tract, and pancrease. MuIFN-alpha, but not HuIFN-alpha, showed intense localization in cells in hepatic sinusoids, marginal zones in the spleen, and pulmonary alveolar walls, suggesting uptake by cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage in these sites. The study shows the utility of biosynthetic labeling for pharmacokinetic studies of cytokines, clear differences in tissue distribution of IFN-alpha according to its species of origin, and targeting of homologous IFN-alpha to cells of the monocytic lineage.
在小鼠中检测了重组[35S]甲硫氨酸标记的人α干扰素(HuIFN-α)和鼠α干扰素(MuIFN-α)的药代动力学、组织分布、细胞定位以及对肿瘤异种移植物的渗透情况。两种干扰素(IFN)均以快速双相方式从血液中清除;HuIFN-α的清除速度比MuIFN-α快。对组织进行放射性分析,90%以上的IFN可得到解释。IFN主要在肝脏、肾脏、胃肠道、胰腺、脾脏和肺中检测到。与HuIFN-α相比,MuIFN-α在肝脏、脾脏和肺中的水平较高,而在肾脏、胰腺和胃肠道中的水平较低。心脏、大脑、睾丸、胸腺、淋巴结、脂肪、皮肤和骨骼肌中两种IFN的含量都低得多,但可检测到。HuIFN-α可渗透到肿瘤异种移植物中。IFN-α的药代动力学与小鼠品系(BALB/c或CBA)、免疫剥夺或肿瘤异种移植物的存在无关。对注射HuIFN-α或MuIFN-α的小鼠组织切片进行放射自显影显示,肾脏近端曲管中有局灶性放射性,肝脏、胃肠道和胰腺中有弥漫性放射性。MuIFN-α而非HuIFN-α在肝血窦细胞、脾脏边缘区和肺泡壁中显示出强烈定位,表明这些部位的单核细胞/巨噬细胞系细胞摄取了MuIFN-α。该研究显示了生物合成标记在细胞因子药代动力学研究中的实用性、根据IFN-α来源物种不同其组织分布存在明显差异以及同源IFN-α靶向单核细胞系细胞的情况。