高、低控球率对英格兰足球超级联赛足球比赛中身体和技术特征的影响。
The effect of high and low percentage ball possession on physical and technical profiles in English FA Premier League soccer matches.
机构信息
Department of Sport & Exercise Sciences, Soccer Research Group, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
出版信息
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(12):1261-70. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.786185. Epub 2013 May 22.
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of high (HPBPT) and low percentage ball possession teams (LPBPT) on physical and technical profiles in elite soccer matches. Match performance data were collected from players in the English FA Premier League (n = 810) using a multiple-camera computerised tracking system. Physical indicators such as the total (10690 ± 996 vs 10778 ± 979 m; effect size [ES] = 0.11) and high-intensity running distance covered in matches (931 ± 299 vs 938 ± 311 m; ES = 0.13) did not differ between HPBPT and LPBPT. However, high-intensity running with ball possession in HPBPT was 31% higher (P < 0.01) than LPBPT (449 ± 266 vs 343 ± 236 m; ES = 0.42) but 22% lower without ball possession (423 ± 153 vs 539 ± 177 m; ES = 0.73). Players in HPBPT performed 44% more (P < 0.01) passes than those in LPBPT (35.3 ± 14.2 vs 24.6 ± 11.2; ES = 0.83). This trend was also evident (P < 0.05) for successful passes, received passes, touches per possession, shots, dribbles and final-third entries (ES range of 0.20-0.94). Central defenders of LPBPT covered 33% less (P < 0.01) high-intensity running with ball possession than central defenders of HPBPT. While fullbacks, attackers, central and wide midfielders of LPBPT covered more (P < 0.01) high-intensity running without and less with ball possession than their HPBPT counterparts (ES range of 0.91-1.23). Technical indicators such as total passes and passes received were higher (P < 0.01) across all positions in HPBPT than LPBPT (ES range of 0.82-1.52). The data demonstrate that percentage ball possession does not influence the overall activity profile of a team but impacts on the composition of high-intensity running efforts (with and without ball) and some technical elements of performance. Position-specific changes in physical and technical profiles were evident for teams employing different ball possession percentages and this information could aid training preparation.
本研究旨在探讨高（HPBPT）和低百分比控球球队（LPBPT）对精英足球比赛中身体和技术特征的影响。使用多摄像机计算机跟踪系统从英格兰足球超级联赛（n = 810）的球员中收集比赛表现数据。在比赛中，总跑动距离（10690 ± 996 与 10778 ± 979 m；效应量[ES] = 0.11）和高强度跑动距离（931 ± 299 与 938 ± 311 m；ES = 0.13）等身体指标在 HPBPT 和 LPBPT 之间没有差异。然而，在 HPBPT 中，有球控球的高强度跑动距离比 LPBPT 高 31%（P < 0.01）（449 ± 266 与 343 ± 236 m；ES = 0.42），但无球控球的高强度跑动距离低 22%（423 ± 153 与 539 ± 177 m；ES = 0.73）。HPBPT 中的球员传球次数比 LPBPT 中的球员多 44%（P < 0.01）（35.3 ± 14.2 与 24.6 ± 11.2；ES = 0.83）。这种趋势在成功传球、接球、每控球触球次数、射门、盘带和进入最后三区的次数（ES 范围为 0.20-0.94）中也很明显。LPBPT 的中后卫的有球控球高强度跑动距离比 HPBPT 的中后卫少 33%（P < 0.01）。而 LPBPT 的边后卫、前锋、中前卫和边前卫的无球控球高强度跑动距离和有球控球高强度跑动距离都比 HPBPT 的球员多（ES 范围为 0.91-1.23）。在 HPBPT 中，所有位置的总传球次数和接球次数都高于 LPBPT（P < 0.01）（ES 范围为 0.82-1.52）。数据表明，在所有位置上，球的百分比都不会影响球队的整体活动水平，但会影响高强度跑动（有球和无球）的组成以及一些表现的技术要素。使用不同控球百分比的球队在身体和技术特征上都有明显的位置变化，这些信息可以帮助训练准备。
Zotero 插件