Liu Tianbiao, Yang Lang, Chen Huimin, García-de-Alcaraz Antonio
School of Physical Education and Sports Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:722200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722200. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of high (HPBPT) and low percentage ball possession teams (LPBPT) on physical and technical-tactical performance indicators in the Chinese Football Super League (CSL). Eight physical performance indicators and 26 technical-tactical performance indicators from all 240 matches from season 2018 were analyzed, as well as three contextual variables (team strength, quality of opposition, and match location). Players were divided according to five positions: fullbacks, central defenders, wide midfielders, central midfielders, and attackers. A k-means cluster analysis was conducted to classify all match observations into two groups: HPBPT ( = 229) and LPBPT ( = 251). A mixed linear model was fitted with contextual variables as covariates. When significant interactions or main effects were detected, a comparison was used to compare physical and technical/tactical differences between HPBPT and LPBPT. Results showed that central defenders and fullbacks covered more high-intensity and sprint running distance in the high possession teams, while wide midfielders and forward covered more high-intensity and sprint running distance in the low possession teams. Meanwhile, players from high ball possession teams were strong in technical indicators, especially in attacking organization. These results may help coaches to understand current football development trends and develop suitable training plans and tests for elite football players.
本研究旨在调查中国足球超级联赛(CSL)中高控球率球队(HPBPT)和低控球率球队(LPBPT)对体能和技战术表现指标的影响。分析了2018赛季全部240场比赛的八项体能表现指标和26项技战术表现指标,以及三个背景变量(球队实力、对手质量和比赛地点)。球员按五个位置划分:边后卫、中后卫、边前卫、中前卫和前锋。进行了k均值聚类分析,将所有比赛观察结果分为两组:HPBPT(=229)和LPBPT(=251)。采用混合线性模型,将背景变量作为协变量。当检测到显著的交互作用或主效应时,使用比较来比较HPBPT和LPBPT之间的体能和技战术差异。结果表明,高控球率球队中的中后卫和边后卫覆盖了更多的高强度和冲刺跑距离,而低控球率球队中的边前卫和前锋覆盖了更多的高强度和冲刺跑距离。同时,高控球率球队的球员在技术指标方面表现出色,尤其是在进攻组织方面。这些结果可能有助于教练了解当前足球发展趋势,并为精英足球运动员制定合适的训练计划和测试。