Marcino Joe
Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Oxford, MD 21654 , USA.
J Aquat Anim Health. 2013 Jun;25(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/08997659.2013.781552.
Two methods for colorimetric in situ DNA probe hybridization (CISH) assays on paraffin-embedded tissue sections were compared. The heated method used heat (90-100°C) to denature DNA in the sample prior to probe hybridization, while the unheated method used a standard hybridization temperature of 42°C. Both procedures were tested on tissue samples that harbored the mollusk protozoan pathogens Perkinsus marinus, P. chesapeaki, or Haplosporidium nelsoni, the protozoan and bacterial fish pathogens Myxobolus cerebralis (myxosporidean) or Renibacterium salmoninarum (bacterial), or the crab viral pathogen Callinectes sapidus reovirus. Samples were fixed in either formalin or Davidson's fixative and embedded in paraffin for histological examination. The heated method is labor intensive and highly prone to human error, while the unheated method is less labor intensive and can be completed in a shorter period of time. Both methods yielded similar hybridization results. The use of complex and expensive prehybridization buffers did not improve the performances of the tested CISH assays. Prehybridization heat denaturation of DNA in assayed samples increased both assay duration and loss of samples but did not improve hybridization signals.
比较了两种在石蜡包埋组织切片上进行比色原位DNA探针杂交(CISH)检测的方法。加热法在探针杂交前用热(90-100°C)使样品中的DNA变性,而未加热法使用42°C的标准杂交温度。两种方法都在含有软体动物原生动物病原体马氏派琴虫、切氏派琴虫或尼尔森单孢子虫、原生动物和细菌性鱼类病原体脑粘体虫(粘孢子虫)或鲑肾杆菌(细菌)、或蟹类病毒病原体美洲蓝蟹呼肠孤病毒的组织样本上进行了测试。样本用福尔马林或戴维森固定液固定,然后包埋在石蜡中进行组织学检查。加热法劳动强度大且极易出现人为误差,而未加热法劳动强度较小且能在更短时间内完成。两种方法产生的杂交结果相似。使用复杂且昂贵的预杂交缓冲液并不能提高所测试的CISH检测的性能。对检测样本中的DNA进行预杂交热变性会增加检测时间和样本损失,但不会改善杂交信号。