aUniversity of California, Berkeley, California bWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, California cIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts dUniversity of California San Francisco, California, USA eUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa fUS Department of State, Washington, DC, USA.
AIDS. 2013 Mar 27;27(6):1001-1009. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835da401.
To evaluate the effect of oral and injectable hormonal contraception on the risk of HIV acquisition among women in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
Secondary data analysis of 4913 sexually active women aged 18-49 years followed for up to 24 months in the Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA) phase III effectiveness trial of the diaphragm and lubricant gel for HIV prevention.
Participants were interviewed quarterly about contraception and sexual behavior and were tested for pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infections. We used a Cox proportional hazards marginal structural model, weighted by the inverse probability of hormonal contraception use, to compare the risk of HIV acquisition among nonpregnant women reporting use of combined oral contraceptive pills (COC), progestin-only pills (POP), and/or injectable hormonal contraception to women not using these methods.
During the study, 283 participants seroconverted. Use of oral contraceptives (POP or COC) was not associated with HIV risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HRa) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32, 1.78]. Injectable hormonal contraception was associated with a small nonsignificant risk of HIV infection (HR(a) = 1.34, 95% CI 0.75, 2.37). The effect of injectable hormonal contraception was similar in the unweighted site-adjusted only (HR(a) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.00, 1.74) and baseline factor adjusted models (HR(a) = 1.27, 95% CI 0.94, 1.72).
In this study, oral contraceptives were not associated with HIV acquisition. There is substantial uncertainty in the effect of injectable hormonal contraception on HIV risk. These findings underscore the importance of dual protection with condoms and the need for diverse contraceptive options for women at risk of HIV infection.
评估口服和注射用激素避孕药对南非和津巴布韦女性中艾滋病毒感染风险的影响。
对在非洲改善生殖健康方法(MIRA)三期试验中接受阴道隔膜和润滑剂凝胶预防艾滋病毒的 4913 名 18-49 岁有性行为的女性进行二次数据分析。
参与者每季度接受一次关于避孕和性行为的访谈,并进行妊娠、艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染的检测。我们使用 Cox 比例风险边缘结构模型,根据激素避孕药使用的逆概率进行加权,比较报告使用复方口服避孕药(COC)、单纯孕激素避孕药(POP)和/或注射用激素避孕药的非妊娠女性与未使用这些方法的女性的艾滋病毒感染风险。
在研究期间,有 283 名参与者血清转化。口服避孕药(POP 或 COC)的使用与艾滋病毒风险无关[调整后的危险比(HRa)=0.86,95%置信区间(CI)0.32,1.78]。注射用激素避孕药与艾滋病毒感染的小但无统计学意义的风险相关(HR(a)=1.34,95%CI 0.75,2.37)。在未加权的仅地点调整和基线因素调整模型中,注射用激素避孕药的效果相似(HR(a)=1.32,95%CI 1.00,1.74;HR(a)=1.27,95%CI 0.94,1.72)。
在这项研究中,口服避孕药与艾滋病毒感染无关。注射用激素避孕药对艾滋病毒风险的影响存在很大的不确定性。这些发现强调了使用避孕套进行双重保护的重要性,以及为感染艾滋病毒风险的女性提供多样化避孕选择的必要性。