改革研究评估。
Reforming research assessment.
作者信息
Schekman Randy, Patterson Mark
出版信息
Elife. 2013 May 16;2:e00855. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00855.
Abstract
It is time for the research community to rethink how the outputs of scientific research are evaluated and, as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment makes clear, this should involve replacing the journal impact factor with a broad range of more meaningful approaches.
摘要
现在是研究界重新思考如何评估科研成果的时候了，正如《旧金山科研评估宣言》所明确指出的，这应该包括用一系列更有意义的方法取代期刊影响因子。
相似文献
1
Reforming research assessment.改革研究评估。
Elife. 2013 May 16;2:e00855. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00855.
2
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.《旧金山科研评估宣言》
Dis Model Mech. 2013 Jul;6(4):869-70. doi: 10.1242/dmm.012955. Epub 2013 May 20.
3
[The San Francisco Declaration--impact factor must not be used to assess an scientists contributions].[《旧金山宣言》——影响因子不得用于评估科学家的贡献]
Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan. 2013 Jun;44(3):161.
4
Announcement: Nature journals support the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.公告：自然科研旗下期刊支持《旧金山科研评估宣言》。
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):394. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.21882.
5
Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation.评判科学应依据其内容，而非其包装：重温塞格伦关于期刊影响力和研究评估的著作。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174205. eCollection 2017.
6
Five years post-DORA: promoting best practices for research assessment.《科研评估卓越实践促进法》颁布五年后：推动科研评估的最佳实践
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Nov 1;28(22):2941-2944. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0534.
7
The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.科学计量学泡沫被认为是有害的。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9632-6. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
8
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) in Nursing Science.《护理科学研究评估旧金山宣言》（DORA）
Nurs Sci Q. 2022 Apr;35(2):275-276. doi: 10.1177/08943184211070602.
9
The San Francisco declaration on research assessment.《旧金山科研评估宣言》
J Exp Biol. 2013 Jun 15;216(Pt 12):2163-4. doi: 10.1242/jeb.090779. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Support Science by Publishing in Scientific Society Journals.支持科学，在科学学会期刊上发表文章。
mBio. 2017 Sep 26;8(5):e01633-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01633-17.
引用本文的文献
1
What are the ethical limits of claimed scientific authorship? a case report of relevance.所谓科学著作权的道德界限是什么？一份相关病例报告。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Mar 17;82(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8.
2
Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan's medical schools, a systematic analysis.台湾医学院教职任命与晋升之系统性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 10;22(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03435-2.
3
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.评估科学家以进行招聘、晋升和终身职位。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 29;16(3):e2004089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089. eCollection 2018 Mar.
4
Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?".对阿圭列斯和阿圭列斯 - 普列托的回复，《编辑们是否应对我们对影响因子的痴迷负责？》
mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6):e02079-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02079-17.
5
What faculty hiring committees want.教师招聘委员会想要的东西。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Sep 11;35(9):885-887. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3962.
6
Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.准备！瞄准！开火！瞄准合适的医学科学期刊。
Cardiovasc Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;6(3):95-100. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science.常用文献计量学在评估转化医学科研中的可行性
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):45-52. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.8. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
8
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level.相对引用率（RCR）：一种利用引用率在文章层面衡量影响力的新指标。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Sep 6;14(9):e1002541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541. eCollection 2016 Sep.
9
The cock, the Academy, and the best scientific journal in the world.公鸡、学会以及世界上最优秀的科学期刊。
Temperature (Austin). 2015 Oct 29;2(4):435-8. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2015.1113097. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
10
Impacted science: impact is not importance.受影响的科学：影响并非重要性。
mBio. 2015 Oct 13;6(5):e01593-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01593-15.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluating how we evaluate.评估我们的评估方式。
Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Sep;23(17):3285-9. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0490.
2
The glacial pace of scientific publishing: why it hurts everyone and what we can do to fix it.科学出版的冰川速度：为何它伤害了每个人以及我们能做些什么来解决它。
FASEB J. 2012 Sep;26(9):3589-93. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-0901ufm.
3
Assessing academic researchers.评估学术研究人员。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Jul 23;51(30):7338-9. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201011. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
4
Metrics: Do metrics matter?指标：指标重要吗？
Nature. 2010 Jun 17;465(7300):860-2. doi: 10.1038/465860a.
Zotero 插件