• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

所谓科学著作权的道德界限是什么?一份相关病例报告。

What are the ethical limits of claimed scientific authorship? a case report of relevance.

作者信息

Argüelles Juan-Carlos

机构信息

Área de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Mar 17;82(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8
PMID:40095066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11914549/
Abstract

Since its discovery in the middle of the XX century, research into autophagy has undergone a spectacular expansion, particularly in the early 1990s. A number of physiological processes involving autophagy have been revealed and important human pathologies have been associated with perturbations in autophagy. In 2008 the "Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy" was launched with the purpose of collecting in a single document all the available information to monitor autophagy, which, it was thought, might be useful for established groups and any new scientists attracted by this field. The usefulness and success of this Guidelines has led to the subsequent publication of editions every 4 years, a task in which a growing number of authors have become involved and consequently included in the list of contributors. However, this worthy initiative and closely associated metric parameters has led to important scholarly repercussions in terms of perceived merits, grants and financial support obtained, professional careers and other areas concerning scientific activity. All these aspects are carefully examined in this contribution.

摘要

自20世纪中叶被发现以来,对自噬的研究经历了惊人的扩展,尤其是在20世纪90年代初。已经揭示了许多涉及自噬的生理过程,并且重要的人类病理学与自噬的扰动有关。2008年发布了《监测自噬的检测方法使用和解释指南》,目的是将所有可用于监测自噬的信息汇总在一份文件中,人们认为这可能对该领域的现有研究团队以及任何被该领域吸引的新科学家有用。本指南的实用性和成功促使其每4年发布一版,参与这项工作的作者越来越多,因此也被列入了贡献者名单。然而,这一有价值的举措以及与之密切相关的度量参数,在感知到的优点、获得的资助和资金支持、职业生涯以及与科学活动相关的其他领域方面,都产生了重要的学术影响。本论文将仔细审视所有这些方面。

相似文献

1
What are the ethical limits of claimed scientific authorship? a case report of relevance.所谓科学著作权的道德界限是什么?一份相关病例报告。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Mar 17;82(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8.
2
Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules.作者身份和公民科学:七个启发式规则。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 29;30(6):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x.
3
Authorship grids: Practical tools to facilitate collaboration and ethical publication.作者身份网格:促进合作与规范发表的实用工具。
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Apr;41(2):195-208. doi: 10.1002/nur.21856.
4
A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications.一种评估科学出版物作者贡献的简单框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1419-1430. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9719-0. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
5
Commentary on 'Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multiauthor article.'.对《学术出版物中的荣誉作者泛滥?当前基于引用的评价指标如何将每篇多作者文章中的诚实贡献者变成(伪)荣誉作者》的评论
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):513. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100940. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
6
Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications.实质性贡献与责任:生物医学出版物中医学撰写人员的最佳署名规范
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jun;34(6):1163-1168. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1451832. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.学术出版物中的名誉作者泛滥?当前基于引文的评价指标的使用如何使每篇多作者文章中诚实的贡献者变成(伪)名誉作者。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-12. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100568. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology.风湿病学中临床研究行为、报告、出版和出版后推广的完整性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;39(4):1049-1060. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-04965-0. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications.提高行业资助临床试验出版物贡献者披露透明度的五步作者框架。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 24;12:197. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0197-z.
10
[Ethical conflicts in the authorship of scientific papers].[科学论文作者署名中的伦理冲突]
Rev Med Chil. 2016 Nov;144(11):1473-1478. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016001100014.

本文引用的文献

1
Where is the field of autophagy research heading?自噬研究领域的发展方向在哪里?
Autophagy. 2023 Apr;19(4):1049-1054. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2166301. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Editorial misconduct: the case of online predatory journals.编辑不当行为:网络掠夺性期刊的案例
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 24;8(3):e08999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08999. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science.支持生命科学知识引用与传播的科研资金科学规律。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(4):1931-1951. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
4
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition).自噬监测分析方法使用和解释的指南(第 4 版)。
Autophagy. 2021 Jan;17(1):1-382. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Trends in Microbiology publications: are classic scientific journals condemned to extinction?微生物学趋势出版物:经典科学期刊是否注定要灭绝?
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020 Sep 1;367(17). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa146.
6
Authors, elite journals under fire after major retractions.在大量撤稿事件后,作者和顶级期刊受到抨击。
Science. 2020 Jun 12;368(6496):1167-1168. doi: 10.1126/science.368.6496.1167.
7
The impact factor: implications for research policy, editorial rules and scholarly reputation.影响因子:对研究政策、编辑规则和学术声誉的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Jun 1;366(11). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz132.
8
The Impact Factor Fallacy.影响因子谬误
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 20;9:1487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487. eCollection 2018.
9
Scholarly reputation.学术声誉。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018 Sep 1;365(18). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny200.
10
Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.透明度在作者的贡献和责任,以促进科学出版的诚信。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.