Suppr超能文献

是否到了采取更系统的方法来应对手术烟雾危害的时候了?——重新审视相关证据。

Is it time for a more systematic approach to the hazards of surgical smoke?: reconsidering the evidence.

机构信息

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coolangatta, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Workplace Health Saf. 2013 Jun;61(6):265-70. doi: 10.1177/216507991306100605. Epub 2013 May 23.

Abstract

Despite recognition of the potential hazards of surgical smoke in the operating room and the adoption of costly extraction devices, little attention has been given to a systematic review of available evidence to inform risk management strategies. Therefore, a comprehensive search of the surgical smoke literature over a 20-year period (1981 to 2011) was undertaken. This search identified 42 appropriate publications. Although a reasonable body of research on the hazardous nature of surgical smoke was found, little substantive data on exposures among operating room personnel or the most appropriate methods to reduce risks were identified. Further empirical data are needed to conclusively establish actual risks, exposure standards, and protective strategies.

摘要

尽管已经认识到手术室中手术烟雾的潜在危害,并采用了昂贵的抽取设备,但很少有人关注对现有证据进行系统审查,以制定风险管理策略。因此,对过去 20 年(1981 年至 2011 年)的手术烟雾文献进行了全面检索。这次检索确定了 42 篇合适的文献。虽然发现了大量关于手术烟雾危害性的研究,但在手术室人员暴露情况或减少风险的最合适方法方面,几乎没有实质性数据。需要进一步的实证数据来明确确定实际风险、暴露标准和防护策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验