Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, AMC-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1181-96. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.797570.
Clinical workplace-based learning has been the means to becoming a medical professional for many years. The importance of an adequate patient mix, as defined by the number of patients and the types of medical problems, for an optimal learning process is based on educational theory and recognised by national and international accreditation standards. The relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based curricula as yet remains unclear.
To review research addressing the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings.
The search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ERIC and the Cochrane Library from the start date of the database to July 2011. Original quantitative studies on the relationship between patient mix and learning for learners at any level of the formal medical training/career were included. Methodological quality was assessed and two reviewers using pre-specified forms extracted results.
A total of 10,420 studies were screened on title and abstract. Of these, 298 articles were included for full-text analysis, which resulted in the inclusion of 22 papers. The quality of the included studies, scored with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), ranged from 8.0 to 14.5 (of 18 points). A positive relationship was found between patient mix and self-reported outcomes evaluating the progress in competence as experienced by the trainee, such as self-confidence and comfort level. Patient mix was also found to correlate positively with self-reported outcomes evaluating the quality of the learning period, such as self-reported learning benefit, experienced effectiveness of the rotation, or the instructional quality. Variables, such as supervision and learning style, might mediate this relationship. A relationship between patient mix and formal assessment has never been demonstrated.
Patient mix is positively related to self-reported learning outcome, most evidently the experienced quality of the learning programme.
临床以工作场所为基础的学习多年来一直是成为医学专业人员的途径。根据患者数量和医疗问题类型来定义充足的患者组合对于最佳学习过程的重要性是基于教育理论并得到国家和国际认证标准认可的。患者组合与工作场所课程中的学习之间的关系尚不清楚。
综述研究工作场所临床环境中患者组合与学习之间的关系。
在 Medline、Embase、Web of Science、ERIC 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了检索,检索时间从数据库开始到 2011 年 7 月。纳入了关于任何级别正式医学培训/职业学习者的患者组合与学习之间关系的原始定量研究。使用预定义表格评估了方法学质量,并由两位评审员提取结果。
总共筛选了 10420 篇标题和摘要。其中,298 篇文章进行了全文分析,最终纳入了 22 篇论文。纳入研究的质量,用医学教育研究研究质量工具(MERSQI)评分,范围为 8.0 至 14.5(共 18 分)。发现患者组合与自我报告的结果之间存在正相关,这些结果评估了学员经历的能力进展,例如自信心和舒适度。患者组合还与自我报告的学习期质量结果呈正相关,例如自我报告的学习收益、经历的旋转有效性或教学质量。监督和学习风格等变量可能会影响这种关系。患者组合与正式评估之间的关系从未得到证明。
患者组合与自我报告的学习结果呈正相关,最明显的是学习计划的体验质量。