Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2013 May 24;14:345. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-345.
BACKGROUND: Circular chromosome conformation capture, when coupled with next-generation sequencing (4C-Seq), can be used to identify genome-wide interaction of a given locus (a "bait" sequence) with all of its interacting partners. Conventional 4C approaches used restriction enzyme digestion to fragment chromatin, and recently sonication approach was also applied for this purpose. However, bioinformatics pipelines for analyzing sonication-based 4C-Seq data are not well developed. In addition, data consistency as well as similarity between the two methods has not been explored previously. Here we present a comparative analysis of 4C-Seq data generated by both methods, using an enhancer element of Pou5f1 gene in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. RESULTS: From biological replicates, we found good correlation (r>0.6) for inter-chromosomal interactions identified in either enzyme or sonication method. Compared to enzyme approach, sonication method generated less distal intra-chromosomal interactions, possibly due to the difference in chromatin fragmentation. From all mapped interactions, we further applied statistical models to identify enriched interacting regions. Interestingly, data generated from the two methods showed 30% overlap of the reproducible interacting regions. The interacting sites in the reproducible regions from both methods are similarly enriched with active histone marks. In addition, the interacting sites identified from sonication-based data are enriched with ChIP-Seq signals of transcription factors Oct4, Klf4, Esrrb, Tcfcp2i1, and Zfx that are critical for reprogramming and pluripotency. CONCLUSIONS: Both enzyme-based and sonication-based 4C-Seq methods are valuable tools to explore long-range chromosomal interactions. Due to the nature of sonication-based method, correlation analysis of the 4C interactions with transcription factor binding should be more straightforward.
背景:环状染色体构象捕获与下一代测序(4C-Seq)结合使用,可以鉴定给定基因座(“诱饵”序列)与其所有相互作用伴侣的全基因组相互作用。传统的 4C 方法使用限制性内切酶消化来片段化染色质,最近也应用了超声处理方法。然而,用于分析基于超声的 4C-Seq 数据的生物信息学管道尚未得到很好的开发。此外,以前没有探索过这两种方法的数据一致性和相似性。在这里,我们使用小鼠胚胎干细胞(ES)中的 Pou5f1 基因增强子元件,对两种方法生成的 4C-Seq 数据进行了比较分析。
结果:从生物学重复中,我们发现酶或超声方法鉴定的染色体间相互作用具有良好的相关性(r>0.6)。与酶方法相比,超声方法生成的染色体内部的远距离相互作用较少,这可能是由于染色质片段化的差异。在所有映射的相互作用中,我们进一步应用统计模型来识别富集的相互作用区域。有趣的是,两种方法生成的数据在可重复的相互作用区域中重叠了 30%。来自两种方法的可重复区域中的相互作用位点与活性组蛋白标记相似富集。此外,从基于超声的数据分析中鉴定的相互作用位点富集了转录因子 Oct4、Klf4、Esrrb、Tcfcp2i1 和 Zfx 的 ChIP-Seq 信号,这些信号对于重编程和多能性至关重要。
结论:基于酶和基于超声的 4C-Seq 方法都是探索长程染色体相互作用的有价值的工具。由于超声处理方法的性质,4C 相互作用与转录因子结合的相关分析应该更直接。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2020-2
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018-9-6
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016-3-3
Bioinformatics. 2016-11-1
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019-5-21
Bioinformatics. 2016-11-1
Nat Methods. 2012-9-9
Nat Biotechnol. 2011-12-25
Science. 2011-10-14