Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚东部克尔萨地区妇女对疟疾的认识和看法,以及对疟疾媒介控制干预措施的使用。

Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, Eastern Ethiopia.

机构信息

College of Health and Medical Science, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2013 May 23;6:20461. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20461.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethiopia has a long history of controlling malaria using vector control tools. Community knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions vary.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine malaria-related knowledge and perceptions among women and to determine the use of malaria vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), among households in Kersa, Eastern Ethiopia.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Kersa Demographic Surveillance and Health Research Center (KDS-HRC) site from October to November 2010. A total of 2,867 households were involved in the study. The data was collected via face-to-face interviews with the women of the household using a pre-tested questionnaire. The questionnaire contained closed, semiclosed, and open-ended questions to explore the reasons for non-use of the interventions. Each knowledge, perception, and practice question was analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Of the total women, 2,463 (85.9%) had heard of malaria. Of them, 1,413 (57.4%) mentioned malaria as a communicable disease. But, only 793 (56.1%) of them associated mosquito bites with malaria transmission. Seven hundred and ninety-eight of the respondents (27.8%) had IRS coverage, and of these, 59 (7.4%) had re-plastered their interior walls following the application of insecticides. Of net-owning households, 33.5% had used at least one long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) the night before the survey. Societal reasons such as holy days and dislike of the insecticide mainly due to fear of its effects on their livestock, were the main reasons for re-spondents replastering their walls.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of women had heard about malaria, but there was a knowledge gap regarding the route of malaria transmission. Less than one-third of the surveyed household houses were sprayed with insecticides, and a low proportion of net-owning households actually used their nets. Efforts must be made to ensure the correct channeling of information about malaria, particularly regarding the importance of using malaria vector control interventions. Furthermore, to maximize the benefit of the intervention in the district, IRC coverage and LLIN use need to be stronger.

摘要

背景

埃塞俄比亚长期以来一直使用病媒控制工具来控制疟疾。社区对疟疾的了解和看法以及对疟疾病媒控制干预措施的使用情况各不相同。

目的

本研究旨在确定在埃塞俄比亚东部的 Kersa 地区,妇女对疟疾的相关知识和看法,以及家庭对主要病媒控制干预措施(室内滞留喷洒(IRS)和经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN))的使用情况。

设计

2010 年 10 月至 11 月,在 Kersa 人口监测和健康研究中心(KDS-HRC)现场进行了一项横断面调查。共有 2867 户家庭参与了这项研究。通过与家庭中的妇女进行面对面访谈,使用预先测试的问卷收集数据。问卷包含封闭、半封闭和开放式问题,以探索不使用干预措施的原因。每个知识、看法和实践问题都单独进行分析。

结果

在总共的妇女中,有 2463 人(85.9%)听说过疟疾。其中,有 1413 人(57.4%)将疟疾视为一种传染病。但是,只有 793 人(56.1%)将蚊子叮咬与疟疾传播联系起来。798 名受访者(27.8%)有 IRS 覆盖,其中 59 人(7.4%)在应用杀虫剂后重新粉刷了内墙。在拥有蚊帐的家庭中,33.5%的人在前一天晚上至少使用了一张长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)。社会原因,如圣日和不喜欢杀虫剂,主要是因为担心它对他们的牲畜有影响,是受访者重新粉刷墙壁的主要原因。

结论

相当多的妇女听说过疟疾,但对疟疾传播途径存在知识差距。接受调查的家庭中,不到三分之一的家庭房屋喷洒了杀虫剂,而拥有蚊帐的家庭中,实际使用蚊帐的比例很低。必须努力确保有关疟疾的信息正确传递,特别是有关使用疟疾病媒控制干预措施的重要性。此外,为了最大限度地发挥干预措施在该地区的效益,需要加强 IRS 覆盖率和 LLIN 的使用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria.室内滞留喷洒预防疟疾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD006657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006657.pub2.
10
Malaria vector control and personal protection.疟疾媒介控制与个人防护。
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2006;936:1-62, back cover.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验