Suppr超能文献

不同患者稳定技术的肩部压力比较。

A comparison of shoulder pressure among different patient stabilization techniques.

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):478.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.037. Epub 2013 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pressure placed on the shoulders as a function of varying degrees of head-down tilt (the Trendelenburg position) and to compare these pressures among 3 different patient-positioning systems.

STUDY DESIGN

Participants were placed in the dorsal-lithotomy position with arms tucked and tilted at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 degrees of head-down tilt. Using a manometer, we measured the pressure (centimeters of water) on the shoulders at each angle for 3 support devices: the Skytron shoulder support (Skytron, Grand Rapids, MI), the Allen shoulder support (Allen Medical Systems, Acton, MA), and the Allen Hug-u-Vac.

RESULTS

Among 23 participants, body mass index (mean ± SD) was 24.5 ± 4.3 kg/m(2). As the tilt angle increased, so did the shoulder pressure for all support systems. At a 30-degree Trendelenburg position, the Allen Hug-u-Vac transmitted less pressure to the shoulders than the Skytron (right and left, P < .001) and the Allen shoulder supports system (right, P < .001; left, P = .434). Each participant was asked, "Which system was most comfortable?" Seventy-four percent of the participants reported that they preferred the Hug-u-Vac (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder pressure increases as tilt angle increases. Of the 3 support systems that were tested, the Allen Hug-u-Vac transmitted less pressure to the shoulders at a 30-degree Trendelenburg position than the Skytron and the Allen shoulder support systems.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同头低脚高位(特伦德伦伯卧位)下肩部所承受的压力,并比较 3 种不同患者体位安置系统的压力。

研究设计

参与者取俯臥分腿位,手臂内收,头低脚高位分别倾斜 5、10、15、20、25 和 30 度。使用压力计,我们在每个角度下为 3 种支撑装置(Skytron 肩部支撑装置、Allen 肩部支撑装置和 Allen Hug-u-Vac)测量肩部的压力(厘米水柱)。

结果

在 23 名参与者中,体重指数(均值±标准差)为 24.5±4.3kg/m²。随着倾斜角度的增加,所有支撑系统的肩部压力都随之增加。在 30 度特伦德伦伯卧位时,Allen Hug-u-Vac 向肩部传递的压力小于 Skytron(右侧和左侧,P<0.001)和 Allen 肩部支撑系统(右侧,P<0.001;左侧,P=0.434)。每个参与者都被问到“哪个系统最舒适?”74%的参与者表示更喜欢 Hug-u-Vac(P<0.001)。

结论

随着倾斜角度的增加,肩部压力也随之增加。在测试的 3 种支撑系统中,Allen Hug-u-Vac 在 30 度特伦德伦伯卧位时向肩部传递的压力小于 Skytron 和 Allen 肩部支撑系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验