Tong Darryl, Beirne Ross
Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Mil Med. 2013 Apr;178(4):421-6. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00522.
There has been a reported increase in combat-related head, face, and neck (HFN) injuries among service personnel wearing combat body armor (CBA) that have deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Modern ceramic plate CBA has decreased the incidence of fatal-penetrating injuries to the torso but offers no protection to the limbs and face which remain exposed to gunshot wounds and fragments from explosive devices. The aim of this review was to systematically summarize the literature reporting on HFN injuries sustained by combat personnel wearing CBA and to highlight recommendations for increased protection to the facial region. Three major contributing factors were identified with this proportional increase in HFN injuries, namely the increased survivability of soldiers because of CBA, fragments injuries from explosive devices, and the lack of protection to the face and limbs. There appears to be no evidence to suggest that by virtue of wearing CBA the likelihood of sustaining an HFN injury increases as such, but a higher incidence of fragment injuries to the HFN region may be due to the more common use of improvised explosive devicess and other explosive devices. Further development of lightweight protection for the face is needed.
据报道,在部署到伊拉克和阿富汗的身着作战防弹衣(CBA)的军事人员中,与战斗相关的头部、面部和颈部(HFN)损伤有所增加。现代陶瓷板作战防弹衣降低了躯干致命穿透伤的发生率,但对仍暴露于枪伤和爆炸装置碎片的四肢和面部没有防护作用。本综述的目的是系统总结关于身着作战防弹衣的战斗人员所遭受的HFN损伤的文献报道,并强调加强对面部区域防护的建议。HFN损伤的这种成比例增加确定了三个主要促成因素,即由于作战防弹衣士兵存活率提高、爆炸装置造成的碎片伤以及面部和四肢缺乏防护。似乎没有证据表明,仅仅因为身着作战防弹衣,遭受HFN损伤的可能性就会增加,但HFN区域碎片伤发生率较高可能是由于简易爆炸装置和其他爆炸装置使用更为普遍。需要进一步研发轻质面部防护装备。