[Influence of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on peri-implant gingival discoloration:a spectrophotometric comparison].

PURPOSE

To compare the gingival discoloration of implant supported all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations in anterior maxillary region by spectrophotometric evaluation.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with 29 implant-supported single crowns (11 all-ceramic restorations, 9 PFM restorations with titanium abutment and 9 PFM restorations with golden alloy abutment) in anterior maxillary area were recruited. The color difference between peri-implant gingiva and contra-lateral/neighboring mucosa was assessed using a spectrophotometer in CIELab coordinates. Subjective gingival discoloration scores were evaluated by clinician. SPSS17.0 software package was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between all-ceramic group (3.4±1.8) and PFM group (4.9±3.4) spectrophotometrically. No significant difference was found between all-ceramic restorations and PFM restorations with titanium abutment (3.5±2.5), and no significant difference was found between PFM restorations with titanium abutment and PFM restorations with gold alloy abutment (6.3±3.8) either. There was, however, significant difference between all-ceramic restorations and PFM restorations with gold alloy abutment (P=0.037). There was no significant difference between all-ceramic group and PFM group regarding the clinical gingival discoloration score (GDS), and this gingival discoloration score was found to have significant correlation with the spectrophotometric evaluation (rs=0.426, P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference between all-ceramic group and PFM group as regard to both spectrophotometric and clinical evaluation of gingival discoloration, but the PFM restorations with gold alloy abutment induce significantly higher discoloration than all-ceramic restorations.