Suppr超能文献

[种植体支持的氧化锆与烤瓷熔附金属修复体的冠颜色匹配:分光光度法比较]

[Crown color match of implant-supported zirconia and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: a spectrophotometric comparison].

作者信息

Peng Min, Fei Wei, Hosseini Mandana, Gotfredsen Klaus

出版信息

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;32(1):62-5. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2014.01.015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the crown color match of implant-supported zirconia restorations and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations in the anterior maxillary region through spectrophotometric evaluation.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with 29 implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxillary area were recruited. Eleven of the implant crowns were zirconia restorations and 18 were PFM restorations. Color matching of the implant crown with contra-lateral/ neighboring tooth at the position of body 1/3 of the crown was assessed using a spectrophotometer (SpectroShade) in CIE L* a* b* coordinates. Subjective crown color match scores were evaluated. Independent sample t test of SPSS 17.0 was used to compare the difference between zirconia restoration and PFM restoration. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the spectrophotometric color difference and the subjective crown color match score. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the distribution of color coordinates of natural anterial teeth.

RESULTS

The crown color of the implant-supported zirconia restorations and PFM restorations were both lighter than that of natural teeth (delta L, 4.5 +/- 3.2, 1.0 +/- 2.6). The lightness difference induced by zirconia restorations was significantly larger than that induced by PFM restorations (P=0.004). The spectrophotometric crown color difference (delta E) induced by zirconia restorations (7.0 +/- 2.8) was significantly larger than that induced by PFM restorations (4.0 +/- 1.9) (P=0.002), and both values were beyond the clinical thresholds (3.7).

CONCLUSION

The spectrophotometric crown color difference induced by zirconia restorations was significantly larger than that induced by PFM restorations. However, they were indistinguishable in subjective evaluation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过分光光度法评估,比较上颌前部区域种植体支持的氧化锆修复体与金属烤瓷(PFM)修复体的冠部颜色匹配情况。

方法

招募了18例患者,其在上颌前部区域有29颗种植体支持的单冠。其中11颗种植体冠为氧化锆修复体,18颗为PFM修复体。使用分光光度计(SpectroShade)在CIE L* a* b*坐标下,评估种植体冠在冠体1/3位置与对侧/邻牙的颜色匹配情况。评估主观冠部颜色匹配分数。使用SPSS 17.0的独立样本t检验比较氧化锆修复体与PFM修复体之间的差异。采用Spearman相关性分析分光光度色差与主观冠部颜色匹配分数之间的关系。使用描述性统计分析天然前牙颜色坐标的分布情况。

结果

种植体支持的氧化锆修复体和PFM修复体的冠部颜色均比天然牙浅(ΔL分别为4.5±3.2、1.0±2.6)。氧化锆修复体引起的明度差异显著大于PFM修复体(P = 0.004)。氧化锆修复体引起的分光光度冠部色差(ΔE)(7.0±2.8)显著大于PFM修复体(4.0±1.9)(P = 0.002),且两个值均超出临床阈值(3.7)。

结论

氧化锆修复体引起的分光光度冠部色差显著大于PFM修复体。然而,在主观评估中它们难以区分。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review.颜色与陶瓷和氧化锆修复体相关:综述。
Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
6
Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination.
Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):244-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0014-3. Epub 2005 Oct 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验