Suppr超能文献

为什么医生会停止从事产科工作?医疗事故索赔的影响。

Why do physicians stop practicing obstetrics? The impact of malpractice claims.

作者信息

Rosenblatt R A, Weitkamp G, Lloyd M, Schafer B, Winterscheid L C, Hart L G

机构信息

University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):245-50.

PMID:2371029
Abstract

We studied all physicians who purchased obstetric malpractice insurance from the Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange and Association between January 1, 1982 and July 1, 1988. Of the 690 physicians studied, 171 (32% of the family physicians and 10% of the obstetricians) discontinued obstetrics but remained in practice. Physicians who discontinued obstetric practice were older, more likely to practice in an urban area, and more likely to be in solo practice than those who did not. Obstetricians who discontinued obstetric practice had a higher rate of new obstetric malpractice claims than did those who did not quit practicing obstetrics--14.5 versus 6.2 claims per 100 physician-years of coverage. By contrast, those family physicians leaving obstetrics had a lower rate of new claims than their peers who did not quit. We conclude that older physicians--particularly those in urban and solo practice--are most likely to stop practicing obstetrics, regardless of specialty. In addition, being named as the target of an obstetric malpractice claim plays a significant role in the decision of some obstetricians to discontinue obstetric practice.

摘要

我们研究了1982年1月1日至1988年7月1日期间从华盛顿州医师保险交易所及协会购买产科医疗事故保险的所有医生。在研究的690名医生中,171名(占家庭医生的32%和产科医生的10%)停止了产科工作,但仍在行医。与未停止产科工作的医生相比,停止产科工作的医生年龄更大,更有可能在城市地区行医,且更有可能独立执业。停止产科工作的产科医生的新产科医疗事故索赔率高于未停止产科工作的医生——每100名医生年承保期的索赔率分别为14.5起和6.2起。相比之下,那些离开产科的家庭医生的新索赔率低于未离职的同行。我们得出结论,年长的医生——尤其是那些在城市独立执业的医生——无论专业如何,最有可能停止产科工作。此外,被列为产科医疗事故索赔的对象在一些产科医生决定停止产科工作的过程中起了重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验