• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往和未来支付的医疗事故索赔的关联。

Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims.

机构信息

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.

NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225436. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436
PMID:36763369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9918873/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Many physicians believe that most medical malpractice claims are random events. This study assessed the association of prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future paid claims; whether public disclosure of prior paid claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of 1 or more prior paid medical malpractice claims with future paid claims.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study assessed the association between prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future claims; whether public disclosure of prior claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. This retrospective case-control study included all 881 876 licensed physicians in the US. All data analysis took place between July, 2018 and January, 2023.

EXPOSURE

Paid medical malpractice claims.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Association between a prior paid medical malpractice claim and likelihood of a paid claim in a future period, compared with simulated results expected if paid claims are random events. Using the same outcomes, we also assessed whether public disclosure of paid claims affects future paid claim rates.

RESULTS

This study included all 881 876 physicians licensed to practice in the US at the time of the study. Overall, 3.3% of the 841 961 physicians with 0 paid claims in the prior period had 1 or more claims in the future period vs 12.4% of the 34 512 physicians with 1 paid claim in the prior period; 22.4% of the 4189 physicians with 2 paid claims in the prior period; and 37% of the 1214 physicians with 3 paid claims in the prior period. The association between prior claims and future claims was similar for high-medical-malpractice-risk and lower-risk specialties; 1 prior-period claim was associated with a 3.1 times higher likelihood of a future-period claim for high-risk specialties (95% CI, 2.8-3.4) vs a 4.2 times higher likelihood for lower-risk specialties (95% CI, 3.8-4.6). The predictive power of a prior paid claim for future claims declined gradually as the time since the prior claim increased, for prior or future periods up to 10 years. Public disclosure did not affect the association between prior and future paid claims.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study of paid medical malpractice claims for all US physicians, a single prior paid claim was associated with substantial, long-lived higher future claim risk, independent of whether a physician was practicing in a high- or low-risk specialty, or whether a state publicly disclosed paid claims. Timely, noncoercive intervention, including education, has the potential to reduce future claims.

摘要

重要性

许多医生认为大多数医疗事故索赔是随机事件。本研究评估了先前支付的索赔(包括单一的先前索赔)与未来支付的索赔之间的关联;公开披露先前支付的索赔是否会影响未来支付的索赔;以及先前和未来支付的索赔之间的关联是否随时间衰减。

目的

检查一个或多个先前支付的医疗事故索赔与未来支付的索赔之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究评估了先前支付的索赔(包括单一的先前索赔)与未来索赔之间的关联;公开披露先前索赔是否会影响未来支付的索赔;以及先前和未来支付的索赔之间的关联是否随时间衰减。这项回顾性病例对照研究包括美国所有 881876 名持照医生。所有数据分析均在 2018 年 7 月至 2023 年 1 月之间进行。

暴露

支付的医疗事故索赔。

主要结果和措施

先前支付的医疗事故索赔与未来期间支付索赔的可能性之间的关联,与如果支付索赔是随机事件的模拟结果进行比较。使用相同的结果,我们还评估了公开披露支付索赔是否会影响未来支付索赔率。

结果

本研究包括在研究期间在美国执业的所有 881876 名医生。总体而言,在先前期间没有 1 次支付索赔的 841961 名医生中,有 3.3%在未来期间有 1 次或更多次索赔,而在先前期间有 1 次支付索赔的 34512 名医生中,这一比例为 12.4%;在先前期间有 2 次支付索赔的 4189 名医生中,这一比例为 22.4%;而在先前期间有 3 次支付索赔的 1214 名医生中,这一比例为 37%。先前索赔与未来索赔之间的关联在高医疗事故风险和低风险专业之间相似;对于高风险专业,先前时期的 1 次索赔与未来时期索赔的可能性增加 3.1 倍(95%CI,2.8-3.4),而对于低风险专业,这种可能性增加 4.2 倍(95%CI,3.8-4.6)。随着时间的推移,先前或未来时期的索赔从先前索赔开始的时间逐渐减少,先前支付的索赔对未来索赔的预测能力也逐渐下降,最长可达 10 年。公开披露并未影响先前和未来支付索赔之间的关联。

结论和相关性

在这项对所有美国医生的支付医疗事故索赔的研究中,单一的先前支付的索赔与未来支付的索赔之间存在实质性的、长期存在的更高风险,这与医生是否在高风险或低风险专业中执业无关,也与州是否公开披露支付的索赔无关。及时、非强制性的干预措施,包括教育,有可能降低未来的索赔。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/1cf4ba045546/jamahealthforum-e225436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/ae40506e017b/jamahealthforum-e225436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/bb06cd443f2a/jamahealthforum-e225436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/1cf4ba045546/jamahealthforum-e225436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/ae40506e017b/jamahealthforum-e225436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/bb06cd443f2a/jamahealthforum-e225436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5d/9918873/1cf4ba045546/jamahealthforum-e225436-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims.既往和未来支付的医疗事故索赔的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225436. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436.
2
The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future?医生的医疗事故索赔历史与后续索赔之间的关系。过去能否预测未来?
JAMA. 1994 Nov 9;272(18):1421-6.
3
Malpractice risk at the physician level: Claim-prone physicians.医生层面的医疗事故风险:易引发索赔的医生。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Aug;58:152-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
4
Rates and Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among US Physicians by Specialty, 1992-2014.1992 - 2014年美国各专科医生医疗事故索赔付费率及特征
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):710-718. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0311.
5
Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among Resident Physicians From 2001 to 2015 in the United States.2001 年至 2015 年美国住院医师付费医疗事故索赔的特征。
Acad Med. 2020 Feb;95(2):255-262. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003039.
6
Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists.模拟训练与妇产科医生医疗事故索赔率的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):246-252. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004464.
7
Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis.美国庭内和庭外解决的付费医疗事故索赔的特征:回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002985.
8
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
9
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.一项在医师职业责任保险公司全国数据库中进行的封闭急诊室医疗事故索赔的流行病学研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x.
10
Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings.支付的不良事件医疗事故索赔:住院和门诊环境。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2427-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.813.

引用本文的文献

1
Medico-legal management of healthcare-associated infections: a cost-effectiveness analysis in an Italian tertiary hospital.医疗保健相关感染的法医学管理:意大利一家三级医院的成本效益分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 27;11:1430625. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1430625. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Practice among Physicians with Malpractice Claims.医生过失索赔后的行医变化。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1247-1255. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1809981.
2
Prevalence and Characteristics of Physicians Prone to Malpractice Claims.易发生医疗事故索赔的医师的流行率和特征。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):354-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506137.
3
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
4
Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼中的索赔、失误及赔偿金支付
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2024-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054479.
5
Patient complaints and malpractice risk.患者投诉与医疗事故风险。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 12;287(22):2951-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.22.2951.
6
Medical malpractice among physicians: who will be sued and who will pay?医生中的医疗事故:谁会被起诉,谁来赔偿?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Sep;3(4):269-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1019014028914.
7
The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future?医生的医疗事故索赔历史与后续索赔之间的关系。过去能否预测未来?
JAMA. 1994 Nov 9;272(18):1421-6.
8
Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?医生的医疗事故经历。是可预测的还是偶然的?
JAMA. 1989 Dec 15;262(23):3291-7.
9
Why do physicians stop practicing obstetrics? The impact of malpractice claims.为什么医生会停止从事产科工作?医疗事故索赔的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):245-50.
10
Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective?医疗事故索赔数据作为一种质量改进工具。二、目标设定是否有效?
JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2093-7.